I Have A Question About "Vigilante"

[Samm]

@tnt

How does she know he’s on the phone phone 911?

I mean yeah, he was acting in self defense. But she could easily claim she felt threatened.

If she truly felt threatened, she should have stayed in her house. She lost the right to claim that she felt threatened when she came back out of her house armed.

[Samm]

@tnt

Why do you think she came out with a gun?

More than likely because she was angry that the man on the motorcycle that she had hit with her car had the audacity to follow her home. But that’s just speculation.

[Samm]

@tnt

And what’s the difference between that and driving to a riot with a gun?

The better question is what is the same about it? Personally, I can’t think of one thing that is the same.

[Samm]

@Scratch

I agree with you that its ■■■■■■ up. But…You can’t pick and choose which felons you’re cool with having a gun. Its either against law or its not.

It’s pretty simple. A felon with a gun who is participating in mayhem at a riot is a threat. A felon with a gun who is sleeping in his bed at his home is not a threat.

Be honest, do you think sending a man to prison for 30 years just because a Jury found him not guilty of killing cop during a botched raid that resulted in the death of his girlfriend is justice?

[Samm]

@WuWei

She was pregnant.

Hormones? Could be.

[Scratch]

@Samm

He honest, do you think sending a man to prison for 30 years just because a Jury found him not guilty of killing cop during a botched raid that resulted in the death of his girlfriend is justice?

Read my post you responded to…

[tnt]

@Samm

If she truly felt threatened, she should have stayed in her house. She lost the right to claim that she felt threatened when she came back out of her house armed.

So this happened in the rittenhouse thread too…everyone telling people how they should respond to specific potentially threatening situations…

[tnt]

@Samm

The better question is what is the same about it? Personally, I can’t think of one thing that is the same.

Do you think it’s provoking in any way?

[tnt]

@WuWei

You didn’t know.

Heck, in that case, BUY MORE GUNS!

[tnt]

@WuWei

She wasn’t equal.

What does that mean?

[Scratch]

And thats the problem with people carrying around guns…It’s too easy to pull out the “I felt threatened” card.

[zantax]

@Samm

@tnt

But she - we’re she alive - would claim she drew her gun because she felt threatened…

She was the aggressor. She initiated the incident. It doesn’t matter that she may have felt threatened.

Still could have legally shot him, if she stayed in the house and he came after her.

[zantax]

@tnt

@Samm

If she truly felt threatened, she should have stayed in her house. She lost the right to claim that she felt threatened when she came back out of her house armed.

So this happened in the rittenhouse thread too…everyone telling people how they should respond to specific potentially threatening situations…

Might be a good idea to familiarize yourself with the law, less time in prison that way.

[tnt]

@zantax

Might be a good idea to familiarize yourself with the law, less time in prison that way.

My comment has nothing to do with the law.

[zantax]

@tnt

@zantax

Might be a good idea to familiarize yourself with the law, less time in prison that way.

My comment has nothing to do with the law.

Of course it does, that is how you determine what you can legally do. That is only irrelevant to criminals. Like child rapists.

[WuWei]

@tnt

@WuWei

You didn’t know.

Heck, in that case, BUY MORE GUNS!

It only takes one.

[WuWei]

@tnt

@WuWei

She wasn’t equal.

What does that mean?

Exactly what it says.

[WuWei]

@Scratch

And thats the problem with people carrying around guns…It’s too easy to pull out the “I felt threatened” card.

There’s no problem with “carrying around guns”.

[WuWei]

@tnt

@zantax

Might be a good idea to familiarize yourself with the law, less time in prison that way.

My comment has nothing to do with the law.

What does it have to do with?

[tnt]

Equal to what?