Requiring a penis as a chaperone insinuates the job can not be done without a penis overseeing the vagina.
Requiring a different standard for female employees in the workplace would absolutely be a violation of Title VII if he puts the responsibility on the state employee to find the chaperone.
GWH
936
No it doesnāt. You want it to, but thatās just you.
I suspect itās not about her. Itās about whether political candidates are denying equal access to journalists regardless of the organs between their legs.
If Foster hasnāt shown a pattern of discrimination, I suspect this suit wonāt go anywhere. If heās allowed men to shadow him without a chaperone, but wonāt allow a woman, he MAY have a problem. Depends on what MS laws says.
Thatās exactly what it means.
It denies women opportunities that it will not deny men.
Foster can shoot the ā ā ā ā on the golf course, or in his office, or at a lunch with a penis. But a vagina will not be given the same opportunity to connect. They need another penis there for their own safety.
Iāve given you her professional body of work, her outletās body of work, and a bunch of examples of how Campbell has professionally done her job involving Foster directly. We donāt have to assume she canāt do her job professionally. Iāve provided direct evidence, including articles and interviews directly about/with Foster, showing her professionalism on the job. That trumps any speculation you THINK you have regarding her personal views bleeding into her work.
Billions of other men are able to do their jobs without ruining the sanctity of their marriage and without being accused of sexual harassment. Weird.
JayJay
941
Noā¦Iām not.
The moral decision Foster and his wife make is not to cheat.
Everything elseā¦including the āBilly Graham Ruleāā¦is just window dressing.
Millions of couples everywhere manage to stay faithful to each other without any additional rules such as these.
And the people he wants to vote for him, if he cares about that sort of thing as a gubernatorial candidate.
Take 3:
How are they not the same when it comes to their ability to objectively write a story about a politician of the opposite sex without trying to make a move on them?
Yes, he is.
A) Knock off the personal shots.
B) Are you also petulant for your name calling of Campbell?
Then so is Foster building a lynch mob against Campbell.
She did? Where. Proof please.
Whatās good for the goose, amirite or amirite?
WHOOSH! Not relevant to the point I made-but I get why it was so reflexively dodge.
If we get to dismiss the integrity of one occupation because of the bad apples, then itās only fair to dismiss the integrity of, well, anyone we want to because of bad apples in that field. Fair?
How should the military handle the āBilly Graham Ruleā amongst its ranks? Should female soldiers be required to get chaperones when meeting with other soldiers adhering to the āBilly Graham Ruleā?
This case has nothing to do with the military. Nice attempt to move the goal posts though.
