I find this interesting. Woman reporter told to have male colleague accompanying her

[WuWei]

@party-free

If you respond “bull ■■■■■ to a long post, you give the impression that you think the entire post is bull ■■■■■ That’s on you.

I will address this. I neither intend to impress you nor care what your “impressions” of me or my posts are.

As for the rest if it, you know.

[party-free]

@WuWei

I know exactly what it means, that’s why I chose it.

I never claimed to have an innate knowledge of how the news works, so either you don’t get what it means, or you used it incorrectly and are choosing not to accept it. Your choice.

@WuWei

It’s on now. Finished watching Lester Holt a bit ago. Good reporting. No shadowing. Forehead still amazing.

Lester Holt is on your local news? When did he switch jobs?

@WuWei

His house, his rules. He’s not asking her, she’s demanding him. And now the poor li’l thing is suing. She’ll get her lynch mob of this thread us any indication.

Did candidate break any campaign of MS free speech laws? I stated earlier that I’m not keen on such suits.

[WuWei]

@party-free

Lester Holt is on your local news? When did he switch jobs?

Did I say he is? No, I didn’t.

[Konssurvative1]

I was at a conference and ran into a former colleague of mine. She was about 10 years younger, but we were very good friends. We had lunch together in a public cheesecake eatery…and by the time i got back to the office 2 days later, it was all around that I was sleeping with her

So yeah that’s what it’s about. Perception is king. I had an innocent lunch with a friend. Told my wife about it that evening. Then came back to crap. My boss transferred the guy who started the gossip.

[party-free]

@WuWei

I will address this. I neither intend to impress you nor care what your “impressions” of me or my posts are.

If you respond “bull ■■■■■" to a long post, you give the impression that you think the entire post is bull ■■■■■ That’s on you.

If your intent was not to call the entire contents of the post “bull ■■■■■ then responding to the entire post with the word “bull ■■■■■ is an ineffective way to communicate that.

@WuWei

As for the rest if it, you know.

No, YOU “know.”

Dramatic Look

(my synopsis for this video is that the camera zooms on the squirrel’s face, insinuating a serious or dramatic situation."

[WuWei]

You have a nice evening.

[GWH]

Absolutely not. Especially since the media is full of cretins willing to lie to destroy someone.

[party-free]

Then why bring him up or “shadowing” in regard to him?

[WuWei]

@GWH

Absolutely not. Especially since the media is full of cretins willing to lie to destroy someone.

At least you didn’t call them “the press”. It’s entertainment, not news. Lester Holt is the last one standing.

[WuWei]

I sincerely hope this Foster fellow is on the up and up, he sticks to his guns and wins his election.

[gooddad409]

Nah the Champ left office a couple years back. Plus no one can match the Press for lying.

That this woman is considering suing pretty much locks down her intentions were not honorable imo.

[party-free]

Good question.

I think it’s awkward that candidate would be willing to be alone with another man, or would be OK with the reporting shadowing as long as another man were along for the ride, but not another woman?

Dude’s getting some free national press out of all this, and he’s in MS, so regardless, it seems like this will help more than hurt.

I think if he had just said “For my own personal and professional protection, I don’t do ride-alongs or shadowing alone with any journalist. A cameraman or other person employed by the station, as well as an official from my campaign must be present” this wouldn’t be a story at all.

The “Male colleague” part is what gets me.

I don’t see the merit of suing his campaign, though. Would she have a case if he’s allowed a man to shadow her without a colleague?

[party-free]

The only recent poll I can find shows him running distant fourth. “Don’t know/not sure” is beating him badly right now. National news like this will likely bump him up some.

https://www.yallpolitics.com/2019/06/25/new-yall-politics-poll-shows-tate-reeves-leading-primary-and-general-election-ballots/

But this story is the only reason any of us will never hear his name. He’ll most likely disappear back into MS state politics after this and never be heard from again.

[Mountain_Soldier]

@madasheck

@RTchoke

@madasheck

@RTchoke

@madasheck

@GWH

Nah, it’s revealing, especially coupled with the first. Y’all want him out of politics, in order to accomplish that you’re willing to destroy him. Thanks for laying it out like that.

That’s bull. Nobody’s trying to destroy him. He’s the one who’s trying to destroy himself with his stupidity and dropping clues about infidelity. My comment about looking into his background is because the man dropped breadcrumbs (clues).

No he didn’t.

Let’s put it this way. If I was covering him, I’d very likely look into it. Either that or the guy thinks himself a hell of stud.

Of course you would. Politics of personal destruction. Take him out with innuendo and ■■■■■■■■ and a tag line of Where There Is Smoke There Is Fire alongside of pic of him with a woman not his wife.

That is why he is employing an abundance of caution prior to the election. He’s seen the work of the media. We ALL have.

Not at all. It’s a reporter’s job to look for the truth. If that candidate is being unfaithful to his wife that would be a big contradiction. He has nothing to fear from the media unless he has something to hide.

Amazing how liberals trot out that line when it’s convenient. Same with the Patriot Act, right?

[Mountain_Soldier]

@madasheck

@RTchoke

Glad you have such a trusting nature for today’s media.

I certainly don’t.

Nobody said one has to like the news.

CBS and Dan Rather did a bang up job on Bush, that’s for sure.

[WuWei]

@GWH

They can’t see that they’ve done this to themselves.

They don’t think they’ve done anything wrong. It’s his fault.

[RTchoke]

@madasheck

@gooddad409

@party-free

Doesn’t trust FEMALE reporters. They must have male chaperones. Because a female chaperone can’t be trusted.

I wouldn’t trust any of the Jackals in the LSM regardless of sex.

Minus witnesses they could lie about any number of things against the politician.

You forget politicians lie. Donald Trump is the champ in that department.

Which is why he wants a witness around them at all times. If she made a claim he did something the first thing would be 'well we know he did and she is telling the truth because “You forget politicians lie”. ’

He knows he would never be believed no matter what because media already has the preconceived notion that he is lying.

An abundance of caution, always.

[Konssurvative1]

I also consider Chris Wallace to be acknowledged as the press. But yeah. Lester seems to be the last.

[party-free]

Loathing the Patriot Act is not singular to libs. Not a compelling retort

[party-free]

Tell that to O’Keefe.