‘If we had had confidence that the president clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said so’
The dems love criminals.
Part of their base.
An assault on the “King’s men” is a violation of the law. Period.
A common claim by people arrested for allegedly committing a crime.
2 Likes
100 percent
2 Likes
You can’t have both. There is no finding of innocence if it doesn’t go through the court.
Why do you think you know so much about the details of this incident that you are willing to bet on the outcome? Where are you getting your inside information?
So Trump gets a different standard of justice than the old “innocent until proven guilty”?
Want to bet she’s found not guilty?
Because her story makes more sense than the cops.
How can she be found not guilty? Earlier you bet that the charges would be dropped.
More sense to who? You? On what basis?
It makes more sense to you that cops just randomly decided to grab her than it makes sense that she tried to interfere with their arrest? Okay then.
1 Like
Everyone got that cultural revolution brain now.
We don’t understand because we are counter revolutionary pigs.
1 Like
Good to see they left out Alaska (and Hawaii.) Nobody hates Alaska … except Texans. 
3 Likes
CriMInALS!!!
They were doing the right thing, having their check in…
Watch the video and see what you think.
Oh look: “Benjamin Guerrero-Cruz, an illegal alien from Chile, overstayed his visa by more than two years, abusing the Visa Waiver Program under which he entered the United States, which required him to depart the United States on March 15, 2023,” the agency said.“
So you,are upset because someone is being required to follow the agreed upon terms of his visa.
2 Likes
What? You think that video showed the occurrence of her interference? Taking a video of someone while they are not interfering,is no evidence that they didn’t interfere at a separate non videoed time.
1 Like
