:thinking: Explain the difference. How is not filing (i.e. not paying what’s due) fundamentally any different than not reporting income (hiding income overseas) so you don’t owe as much?

Of course you do. Instant expertise. :wink:

Two different legal statutes.

That’s description per the law. I’m talking about the fundamental difference. How is avoiding payment by not filing fundamentally any different than avoiding payment by not reporting all over income?

It’s like the difference between robbery and burglary. Two different statutes, but in both instances it’s taking something that is not yours to take.

Hiding assets, using evasion strategies…versus just not paying.

1 Like

No … In both cases, you are not paying what you owe.

Yes- but legally they are treated differently.

Sorta like there are a few types of murder.

Yeah. I had a neighbor who cheated on his taxes and hid assets. He got a plea deal including several years in federal prison. So yeah, sweetheart deal.

2 Likes

We know Hunter was charged with failure to file and pay. There is now evidence he should have been charged with tax evasion except higher ups stepped in.

3 Likes

You had a neighbor. That’s nice.

That’s not an explanation.

One is an act of omission, the other is taking an affirmative, intentional action to mislead.

1 Like

Oh wow your “neighbor” went out of his way to “hide assets” yes that’s totally the same.

you mean like multiple shell companies that only exist to funnel money through?

4 Likes

How about these, then?

“Shapley said that in Biden’s 2018 tax return, which was filed late and not prepared until 2020, he was “expensing personal expenses, his business expenses. So, I mean, everything, there was a payment that — there was a $25,000 to one of his girlfriends and it said, “golf membership.” And then we went out and followed that money it was for a sex club membership in LA.”
Gary Shapley, Jr., an IRS Criminal Supervisory Special Agent who oversaw the IRS probe into the president’s son, testified that in 2018, Hunter Biden listed payments to prostitutes on his tax returns to the company Owasco P.C., which allegedly “brought in his consulting fees.”

Is that an act of omission?

But why not a charge of tax evasion?

“On Thursday, that House Ways and Means Committee on Thursday released testimony from two IRS whistleblowers who said the Department of Justice, FBI and IRS had interfered with the investigation of the tax evasion case “

1 Like

Intentionally omitted, and they are both not paying the amount that’s due. There is no fundamental difference.

1 Like

I don’t do social media … unless you count this forum as such.

Hunter plea deal fall through, and that Hunter pleaded not guilty…prosecutors said Hunter Biden is currently under investigation.

3 Likes

there is more to it than that and i have the strangest feeling that he judge was covering a doj screw up. not in a conspiratorial way but in the way the deal was structured.

Could be…either way I don’t trust the process anymore.

2 Likes