Did you read their letter? There IS a investagation and it seems to be around nation states inteferaing with our election.
Im not folowing your 1st part. Im trying hard but im not getting it it.
“Because if its not real the FBI would be using it falsely”
Explain that?
if they are investagating outside interference (As the letter said) then it not being real would be a key part of that investagation. Correct?
If it was real - then it wouldnt really be a part of that - and they would say so (according to your logic).
did you read it? it says no such thing. Johnson asked them to divulge if there were foriegn actors involved and they answered him with standard boilerplate. On the subject of whether or not this laptop had anything to do with russian interferance they deferred to the dni.
try reading it again, I didn’t say anything about the fbi using it. I said the fbi would be being used.
if there is no investigation, there is no reason for them not to say so.
there is no Hunter Biden laptop in the FBI’s position;
Hunter Biden never participated in “pay to play” deals within foreign countries, namely China, Ukraine, and Russia;
Joe Biden never threatened to withhold $1 BILLION in U.S. aid to Ukraine if they didn’t fire a prosecutor investigating the gas company, Burisma, his son was involved with;
Is the above what you are suggesting, for starters?
JWK
Our communist/socialist domestic revolutionaries, which now control the Democrat Party Leadership, areknown for accusing others of what they themselves are guilty of.
The letter stats that the FBI warned them that nation states will be trying to influence the election.
Then states that the FBI would be the ones to investagate that.
Then says you asked about the laptop
And says they have nothing to say about it.
Why do you think they are bringing up the 1st two points if the laptop has nothing to do with it?
“I told you Im a football fan and have a faviortate team.
I am the person who always watches Washington Football on sunday and they are playing on Sunday.
I am not going to talk to you about what I am doing on sunday”
If I told you those 3 lines above would you think sunday I plan to go visit wineries?
You have not seen “evidence.” Stop pretending you have. You’ve seen what people want you to see. Copies of copies and without any verifiable information or metadata.
Rather than applying logic and questioning why these people are only giving you what they want you to see, hoping you’ll blindly believe and being insulted that they would think so little of your ability to question these things, instead you just agree that it is “evidence” and repeat it over and over.
and what you claim is admonishment is standard boilerplate which does not identify anything involved as any russia investigation. The case number identifies it as money laundering.
But its prob not Hunters.
And they never said it was.
My guess -with no evidence (Which is more then the fake evidence some are falling for)
Foriegn agents hacked some of hunters info and emails. Took a laptop and filled it with a mix of real and fake emails, picutres, info, etc. Took it to a pansy and encourged him to do what he did with it.
what makes the most sense is that it is hunters laptop. it is the simplest explanation and only one that doesn’t involve wild conspiracies and made for tv plots.
