Hundreds of justice dept officials say trump is a criminal

[PurpnGold]

@peek-a-boo

That simply isn’t the case. So once again, feel free to check back when you are prepared to discuss my prior posts in context. Otherwise, please move along and stop wasting my time.

Right on queue “I’m-done-a-boo” strikes again.

I’m not sure how I missed the context but you are free (and have had the opportunity) to tel me where I lacked context.

You flatly claimed Mueller said something… there is no ambiguity in that. The best source of truth is the source itself. And guess what?! We have access to a report written by Mueller!

So how is it ridiculous to ask you to point to an original source and show me where Mueller said what you said he did?

[peek-a-boo]

The answer you seek is in my prior posts. Unless you come back and respond to one of my relevant posts with follow-up questions, we are done.

[reflechissez]

It’s funny how all of one’s interactions end up like this.

[WuWei]

@Ex-Pat

@Weedhopper

What justice did he obstruct? The Mueller investigation was a fraud because of the phony Russian dossier and image data.

Then it should be easy to find a bunch of prosecutors to defend Trump.

I doubt you could find a bunch of anythings to defend Trump.

[WuWei]

@PurpnGold

@peek-a-boo

You obviously haven’t been paying attention. Feel free to review my recent posts on the topic and come back when you’ve caught up.

No.

You made a definitive statement saying Mueller said something.

The only place where we can verify what Mueller said is in the report.

So I am asking you where in the report I can the assertion you made about what Mueller said.

It’s pretty straight forward.

No, that’s the only place you can verify what he wrote in the report, not what he said.

[enki]

And the number of signees has grown.

https://twitter.com/kylegriffin1/status/1125543289359302656?s=21

[LucyLou]

@enki

And the number of signees has grown.

https://twitter.com/kylegriffin1/status/1125543289359302656?s=21

Can’t wait for the butthurt tweets!

[reflechissez]

Where are the justice dept officials who say trump is not a criminal?

[GWH]

The current ones. Which are the ones that matter.

[markdido]

@Ex-Pat

Against the charges made by over 500 former Justice Department officials.

They weren’t charges, they were opinions.

Former prosecutors can’t charge squat.

[Forcefield]

@peek-a-boo

Never Trumper’s have sold their soul to the DEMs and are simply carrying their water.

Actually that isn’t the case at all. Trump worshipping forum members have offered their opinions, but that is a far cry from demonstrating anything - other than an opinion.

[DOLOOP]

@markdido

@Ex-Pat

Against the charges made by over 500 former Justice Department officials.

They weren’t charges, they were opinions.

Former prosecutors can’t charge squat.

That’s OK by me.

We all know he criminally obstructed justice, so that’s a good enough start.

[Kelby]

@GWH

The current ones. Which are the ones that matter.

Hmmm…I can think of…one?

[markdido]

@DOLOOP

@markdido

@Ex-Pat

Against the charges made by over 500 former Justice Department officials.

They weren’t charges, they were opinions.

Former prosecutors can’t charge squat.

That’s OK by me.

We all know he criminally obstructed justice, so that’s a good enough start.

We do?

Only in your imagination.

[DougBH]

Lets see. 728 attorneys who worked for the DOJ as far back as Kennedy believe Trump would have been charged if not President.
The DOJ hires 750 attorneys per year. To be conservative, lets say 30 years X 750. Quite a large number.

Not that their opinions arent significant, they are, but that is just a small percentage of current and former DOJ attorneys. How many of them are ardent Trump haters, just like you have ardent Trump haters in this forum?

IOW, that is significant. Not overwhelmingly so. NOt really surprising.

[reflechissez]

@DougBH

Lets see. 728 attorneys who worked for the DOJ as far back as Kennedy believe Trump would have been charged if not President.
The DOJ hires 750 attorneys per year. To be conservative, lets say 30 years X 750. Quite a large number.

Not that their opinions arent significant, they are, but that is just a small percentage of current and former DOJ attorneys. How many of them are ardent Trump haters, just like you have ardent Trump haters in this forum?

IOW, that is significant. Not overwhelmingly so. NOt really surprising.

One should grab onto all info that is comforting.

[DougBH]

Goodness, I saw plenty of that by Democrats in relation to Russian/Trump campaign cooperation during the last two years.
I was lambasted for always saying there is insufficient evidence of collusion for two years, and it turns out I was right in every case.

[DOLOOP]

@markdido

@DOLOOP

@markdido

@Ex-Pat

Against the charges made by over 500 former Justice Department officials.

They weren’t charges, they were opinions.

Former prosecutors can’t charge squat.

That’s OK by me.

We all know he criminally obstructed justice, so that’s a good enough start.

We do?

Only in your imagination.

I should rephrase that.

Everybody who read Mueller’s report knows he criminally obstructed justice.

[WuWei]

@Konssurvative1

So what you are saying is that because he is President he had the ability to commit a crime that he otherwise would not have been able to commit. Right? With that said. The fact that he was the president means that he could have committed obstruction, but he can’t be charged for it. However, he can be impeached for it. Not that I want that. I am against impeachment.

Which takes me back to my original statement. If he wasn’t president, obstruction would not even be an issue. The fact that he is president protects him from any charges being filed in any crime he may or may not have committed right?

Hildawg wasn’t the President.

[WuWei]

@DOLOOP

@markdido

@Ex-Pat

Against the charges made by over 500 former Justice Department officials.

They weren’t charges, they were opinions.

Former prosecutors can’t charge squat.

That’s OK by me.

We all know he criminally obstructed justice, so that’s a good enough start.

Just like we know Hildawg did. Just like we know several cases under Obama. Just like Clinton.