Stupid vs benefited…
let me know which one you want me to provide… thanks!
Samm
206
Yeah … have faith … no matter how remote the chance may be. 
Samm
207
Sort of like Biden saying that a little invasion might be okay?
2 Likes
Samm
208
Well, unless they just invade a little. A “minor incursion” is fine, right?
Great deflection. You have nothing, I m okay with it
You changed away from what i said of course you are ok with it duh?
I also gave you options.
Good talk.
conan
211
Man that didn’t take long…libs playing the victim card.
Aw come on man…I was just funnin around.
1 Like
Well, we might have a few billion dollars more worth of equipment to use for one.
Trump may have left a proverbial grumpy in Biden’s plate in Afghanistan but it’s all on Biden that he spread it all over the walls.
And, while we’re there, by being weak and incompetent (and corrupt) it might be fairly said that this is Biden’s grumpy and now the question is will he spatter this one all over the walls too?
I didn’t say anything good or bad about George Floyd as far as I can recall. Maybe you could waste a few hours of your time looking for something in the archives to prove me wrong.
2 Likes
JayJay
215
She wasn’t talking about you…read the post again.
The same way they played comrade Biden’s approval of Putin making small incursions into Ukraine?
What specifically do you disagree with in Tucker’s editorial there?
1 Like
No, I wasn’t. ■■■ is wrong with you? It was all about Putin. It’s not about Trump. And I can’t even invent a context in which it was about the poster. Also, what’s with the thinned-skinned whining and backstabbing?
conan
222
Your model of love is abusive spouse.
JayJay
223
To be grammatically correct, she should have said “one’s” instead of “your”, but the “your” did not refer to STODR…it referred to Putin…since the clause right before that sentence described Putin and his behaviors towards his own people.
2 Likes
Rhetorical “you,” not the specific person. I can explain it to you, but I can’t understand it for you.
