How the Washington Swamp’s judges and Justices subjugate constitutional limitations

johnwk2 · 2020-09-23T13:32:46.965Z

WuWei:

Speaking of fire, I think more to the point is her vailed threat that our cities will be burned down if she and her communist/socialist crowd don’t get their way.

JWK

BEWARE! The Biden/Harris Administration, in wanting to keep Obamacare, which currently covers less than 9 million ___ many being foreigners/aliens ___ want to take away the existing private health insurance plans from over 150 million American Citizens, and force them into a Communist/Socialist, Cuban style healthcare system.

markdido · 2020-09-23T16:29:35.697Z

Bodecea:

biggestal99:

Prop 8 was a voter initiative, not a legislative act.

Changing law via mob rule is not the way to go.

and thats exactly what prop 8 was.

Allan

I hate the CA Proposition process…when living there, I voted NO on everything.

I feel the same way about Florida’s Voter initiative process

highroller · 2020-09-23T16:43:45.157Z

johnwk2:

Voter initiatives are in fact an attack on our “Republican Form of Government” and embrace mob rule as you point out.

They are also a check on the power of the elite. GOP voters hate other people though so I will never understand them.

johnwk2 · 2020-09-24T13:28:58.331Z

highroller:

johnwk2:

Voter initiatives are in fact an attack on our “Republican Form of Government” and embrace mob rule as you point out.

They are also a check on the power of the elite. GOP voters hate other people though so I will never understand them.

The voting booth is the “check” on the power of the elite.

Your remark about GOP voters is adolescent to say the least.

JWK

The Biden/Harris Administration, in wanting to keep Obamacare, which currently covers less than 9 million ___ many being foreigners/aliens ___ want to also take away the existing private health insurance plans from over 150 million American Citizens, and force them into a Communist/Socialist, Cuban style healthcare system.

highroller · 2020-09-24T13:33:08.367Z

johnwk2:

The voting booth is the “check” on the power of the elite.

No it isn’t. Look at Michigan and Wisconsin for the GOP, New York for the Dems. The elite stay in power because they draw the lines. Voters are helpless in states with extreme gerrymandering.

In Michigan, GOP is using our petition laws to repeal the law the Governor is using to rule the state with emergency powers. If the petition process didn’t exist, they would be helpless.

These are checks against the powerful.

johnwk2 · 2020-09-24T13:37:40.804Z

highroller:

johnwk2:

The voting booth is the “check” on the power of the elite.

No it isn’t. Look at Michigan and Wisconsin for the GOP, New York for the Dems. The elite stay in power because they draw the lines. Voters are helpless in states with extreme gerrymandering.

In Michigan, GOP is using our petition laws to repeal the law the Governor is using to rule the state with emergency powers. If the petition process didn’t exist, they would be helpless.

These are checks against the powerful.

The defect seems to be in you State Constitution which allows such tyranny.

JWK

highroller · 2020-09-24T13:41:21.105Z

Our state constitution is fine So Thanks For your Understanding and Concern!

WorldWatcher · 2020-09-24T14:37:27.126Z

johnwk2:

The voting booth is the “check” on the power of the elite.

Unless you’re Trump, then you just throw out the ballots.
.
.
.
.WW, PSHS

johnwk2 · 2020-09-24T17:51:55.175Z

highroller:

Our state constitution is fine So Thanks For your Understanding and Concern!

Well then, why did you write: “In Michigan, GOP is using our petition laws to repeal the law the Governor is using to rule the state with emergency powers. If the petition process didn’t exist, they would be helpless.”

Does the Constitutional allow unlimited power to the Governor?

JWK

Joe Biden and Kamala Harris’ plan for “free” college tuition, and cancelling student loan debt, will be paid for by taxing millions of college graduates who worked for and paid their own way through college and are now trying to finance their own economic needs.

highroller · 2020-09-24T18:00:18.027Z

johnwk2:

Does the Constitutional allow unlimited power to the Governor?

It has to do with a law passed in 1945 that was never repealed when the new law was updated in 1976. So that is being taken care of now.

The Detroit News

Despite tossed signatures, Unlock Michigan says it has support to limit...

Unlock Michigan, the group that wants to limit Gov. Whitmer's emergency powers during the COVID-19 pandemic, says it's collected enough signatures

johnwk2 · 2020-09-24T18:05:59.426Z

highroller:

johnwk2:

Does the Constitutional allow unlimited power to the Governor?

It has to do with a law passed in 1945 that was never repealed when the new law was updated in 1976. So that is being taken care of now.

So, now you are telling me a legislative Act is superior to your State Constitution?

JWK

The Democrat Party Leadership has been angry, stupid and obnoxious ever since the Republican Party Leadership freed democrat owned slaves and put the KKK out of business. ___ Author unknown

Safiel · 2020-09-24T18:09:41.258Z

State constitutions in general are a mixed breed.

Some like Alabama’s simply need to be burned.

Others like Florida’s or Alaska’s are fairly decent.

highroller · 2020-09-24T18:27:03.023Z

johnwk2:

So, now you are telling me a legislative Act is superior to your State Constitution?

JWK

A constitution is a framework that lays out the rules on how a government will work. Laws are where government actions occur, and I don’t know what state you live in, but there are laws passed all the time.

My state has reserved the power of governance to the people. There are three ways to petition the government, referendum, ballot proposals, and constitutional amendments.

Here’s the state constitution IUW: Michigan Legislature - CONSTITUTION OF MICHIGAN OF 1963

WCD9973 · 2020-09-24T18:38:22.113Z

I notcied this is old and not reading every post. But I did read the OP which honestly -I want to copy and paste on a different site about “Why the need for a ERA”.
I actually have bene indifferent to the ERA -But this guy just outlined why he doesnt think the conistution gurantees equal rights for women.

johnwk2 · 2020-09-24T21:11:46.747Z

Safiel:

State constitutions in general are a mixed breed.

Some like Alabama’s simply need to be burned.

Others like Florida’s or Alaska’s are fairly decent.

Of course Florida’s and Alaska’s constitutions are “fairly decent”.

They do not have the communist/socialist inspired individual income tax.

JWK

Safiel · 2020-09-25T01:06:23.679Z

johnwk2:

Safiel:

State constitutions in general are a mixed breed.

Some like Alabama’s simply need to be burned.

Others like Florida’s or Alaska’s are fairly decent.

Of course Florida’s and Alaska’s constitutions are “fairly decent”.

They do not have the communist/socialist inspired individual income tax.

JWK

It kind of goes a little beyond that.

In any event, while Florida’s State Constitution forbids an income tax, Alaska’s State Constitution permits it, the Alaska Legislature has just never chosen to enact an income tax.

My opposition to the Alabama Constitution boils down to the fact that it is a complete cluster ■■■■■ both the main Constitution and all 946 Amendments. With up to another 6 Amendments to be added in November.

But, this is a subject for another thread, so I won’t delve into the matter beyond that.

johnwk2 · 2020-09-25T11:50:12.610Z

Safiel:

johnwk2:

Safiel:

State constitutions in general are a mixed breed.

Some like Alabama’s simply need to be burned.

Others like Florida’s or Alaska’s are fairly decent.

Of course Florida’s and Alaska’s constitutions are “fairly decent”.

They do not have the communist/socialist inspired individual income tax.

JWK

It kind of goes a little beyond that.

In any event, while Florida’s State Constitution forbids an income tax, Alaska’s State Constitution permits it, the Alaska Legislature has just never chosen to enact an income tax.

My opposition to the Alabama Constitution boils down to the fact that it is a complete cluster ■■■■■ both the main Constitution and all 946 Amendments. With up to another 6 Amendments to be added in November.

But, this is a subject for another thread, so I won’t delve into the matter beyond that.

I agree with your entire response.

JWK

To support Joe Biden and Kamala Harris is to support a continuance with Obama’s love affair with our Global Governance Crowd

highroller · 2020-09-25T15:10:23.592Z

Safiel:

946 Amendments

LOL, people are busybodies in Alabama. We rarely change our constitution in Michigan.

Safiel · 2020-09-25T15:26:10.477Z

highroller:

Safiel:

946 Amendments

LOL, people are busybodies in Alabama. We rarely change our constitution in Michigan.

The Alabama Constitution was ratified in 1901. The convention attendees were white supremacist’s and the Constitution’s purpose was to completely exclude black people and poor whites from having any substantive political power.

A major part of this was centralizing all power in Montgomery. Alabama has ZERO home rule options. Just to enact, increase or decrease a county or municipal tax requires a statewide Constitutional Amendment. Certain changes in county or municipal statutes require a statewide Constitutional Amendment.

Essentially, even if blacks control a municipality or county, they must still come crawling to the white State Legislature and the white majority statewide population to actually DO anything.

It is a racist Constitution.

It is a pathetic Constitution.

It simply needs to be burned.

johnwk2 · 2020-09-25T18:03:33.630Z

highroller:

Safiel:

946 Amendments

LOL, people are busybodies in Alabama. We rarely change our constitution in Michigan.

Getting back to the subject of the thread, why is the socialist/communist controlled democrat party leadership frothing from their mouths and hysterical over President Trump nominating a Justice for the Supreme Court?

What is their big concern about appointing a Supreme Court Justice?

JWK

"The public welfare demands that constitutional cases must be decided according to the terms of the Constitution itself, and not according to judges’ views of fairness, reasonableness, or justice." – Justice Hugo L. Black ( U.S. Supreme Court Justice, 1886 - 1971) Source: Lecture, Columbia University, 1968