It’s clear from many sources that manipulating search engine algorithms can create up to a 20% swing in voter choice. If we add to that a coordinated campaign by globalist-friendly main stream media outlets to demonise the Trump agenda and Republicans, and a coordinated effort by Google and social media platforms to deplatform conservative voices but to leave leftist voices unchecked, it seems valid to ask what the mid-term results for the Senate and House would have been had their been a level playing field? And we should also wonder what the financial value of that Democrat support by supposedly neutral information platforms was, and whether those thumbs on the scales should qualify as undeclared in kind political donations.
As Democrats pout and whine over individual election losses and use the MSM to question the legitimacy of those unfavourable results with claims of election rigging, should not the MSM be questioning the legitimacy of the close Democrat wins on the basis of the orchestrated bias in coverage of 90% of the MSM and internet platforms?
I haven’t yet seen any recalibration of the mid-term results adjusting for a 20% swing due to Google/social media interference, or 10% or even conservatively 5%.
Of course, you do. That’s what the left does. Shut down any discussion that challenges their false narratives. Just Google, “Google algorithms can sway how many voters? 20%” Here’s a link How Google Could Rig the 2016 Election - POLITICO Magazine that mentions 20%, so “up to 20%” is correct. There are many sources under that suggested search that say algorithms can sway votes.
So, get over your “Resist Trump” programming and do some thinking.
You’ve provided one source - Robert Epstein. The man famous for hating Google since they put a warning up about his malware-infected website. His study is based on hilariously ludicrous premises with no reflection in reality.
I’m on it. I have suggested this question to Tucker Carlson. It’s possible he will consult the qualified analysts and shed some light on this. And I’m raising it here. so maybe Sean Hannity will pick it up. Or maybe some expert will respond here.
No. I provided multiple sources via a suggested Google search question, one of which specifically mentioned 20%. So, is the left worried about interference in elections, or is it just interference that compromises the left that is the problem? Another leftist poster’s comment that if the bias hurt Republicans it’s a good thing answers that rhetorical question.
