How Many Denials Were There?

[Call_me_Ishmael]

@fallenturtle

@gooddad409

You have to wonder what they don’t want us knowing about to so strenuously object to parents being able to monitor the class rooms.

If you’re a conservative you should understand the idea of not spending public money on things that aren’t necessary. I know y’all (c) have been programmed to think otherwise, but not everything is a conspiracy theory.

Hahahahahahaha…

I’m a populist anyhow. The parents need to know what indoctrination is being foisted on their children. If the government can pay for addict needles, it can pay to save the children from the evil that progs teach.

[fallenturtle]

@Call_me_Ishmael

@fallenturtle

@gooddad409

You have to wonder what they don’t want us knowing about to so strenuously object to parents being able to monitor the class rooms.

If you’re a conservative you should understand the idea of not spending public money on things that aren’t necessary. I know y’all (c) have been programmed to think otherwise, but not everything is a conspiracy theory.

Hahahahahahaha…

I’m a populist anyhow. The parents need to know what indoctrination is being foisted on their children. If the government can pay for addict needles, it can pay to save the children from the evil that progs teach.

Curriculum and syllabuses should be posted on line. I’d make that a state law if possible. Other than that, parents are (or should be depending on location) be able to visit classrooms. They can also talk to their kids about what they’re learning and there’s back to school nights and parent-teacher conferences. I believe these are sufficient to satisfy a normal non-conspiratorial parent (like myself).

If your (c) mistrust in a teacher is bad enough that you need to install a complex surveillance system in the classrooms then you should just pull your kids out and send them to private school or home school them.

[kingarthur65]

Cameras would show many more disrespectful, unruly students than teachers advocating CRT.
What happens when any parent objects to having their kids recorded in class?

[zantax]

@fallenturtle

@zantax

It’s 2022, beam forming microphones are really good at that.

Assuming the teacher always stands in one spot. More money for something that can track their movements.

Anyway, I’m sure anytime now someone will create a BOM that can be used to prove me wrong.

No, you don’t have to stand in one spot, that’s why Alexa, if you are dumb enough to have one, can hear you from anywhere in the room, even over music or the tv.

[zantax]

@kingarthur65

Cameras would show many more disrespectful, unruly students than teachers advocating CRT.
What happens when any parent objects to having their kids recorded in class?

Already addressed, audio only.

[fallenturtle]

@zantax

@fallenturtle

@zantax

It’s 2022, beam forming microphones are really good at that.

Assuming the teacher always stands in one spot. More money for something that can track their movements.

Anyway, I’m sure anytime now someone will create a BOM that can be used to prove me wrong.

No, you don’t have to stand in one spot, that’s why Alexa, if you are dumb enough to have one, can hear you from anywhere in the room, even over music or the tv.

I doubt it will do an accurate dictation job in a large noisy room. But this is all irrelevant because nobody wants to do this.

[zantax]

@fallenturtle

@gooddad409

You have to wonder what they don’t want us knowing about to so strenuously object to parents being able to monitor the class rooms.

If you’re a conservative you should understand the idea of not spending public money on things that aren’t necessary. I know y’all (c) have been programmed to think otherwise, but not everything is a conspiracy theory.

Who needs government? The parents in my district could and would easily pay for it themselves.

[fallenturtle]

@zantax

@fallenturtle

@gooddad409

You have to wonder what they don’t want us knowing about to so strenuously object to parents being able to monitor the class rooms.

If you’re a conservative you should understand the idea of not spending public money on things that aren’t necessary. I know y’all (c) have been programmed to think otherwise, but not everything is a conspiracy theory.

Who needs government? The parents in my district could and would easily pay for it themselves.

Then why aren’t they?

[zantax]

@fallenturtle

@zantax

@fallenturtle

@zantax

It’s 2022, beam forming microphones are really good at that.

Assuming the teacher always stands in one spot. More money for something that can track their movements.

Anyway, I’m sure anytime now someone will create a BOM that can be used to prove me wrong.

No, you don’t have to stand in one spot, that’s why Alexa, if you are dumb enough to have one, can hear you from anywhere in the room, even over music or the tv.

I doubt it will do an accurate dictation job in a large noisy room. But this is all irrelevant because nobody wants to do this.

Nobody?

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/parents-and-teachers-at-odds-over-push-for-cameras-in-classrooms/ar-AAND7lM

‘Cameras in Classrooms’ bill all but dead

[zantax]

@fallenturtle

@zantax

@fallenturtle

@gooddad409

You have to wonder what they don’t want us knowing about to so strenuously object to parents being able to monitor the class rooms.

If you’re a conservative you should understand the idea of not spending public money on things that aren’t necessary. I know y’all (c) have been programmed to think otherwise, but not everything is a conspiracy theory.

Who needs government? The parents in my district could and would easily pay for it themselves.

Then why aren’t they?

Working on it.

[RTchoke]

@fallenturtle

@RTchoke

I would say that admitting you did it, then giving an excuse as to why you are special and can do it but others cannot is not much of an apology.

Emphasis mine… where did she do that?

“In the excitement after I finished, because it was so much fun working with those kids, I took a picture, and that was a mistake. Protocols matter, and protecting our kids is the most important thing, and anything that can be perceived as undermining that is a mistake, and I apologize."

Put the first excuse in there also. The excuse she gave could also apply to anyone else in that school, but they can’t avail themselves of it. She’s sorry, not sorry and only after a week of backlash.

[fallenturtle]

@zantax

@fallenturtle

@zantax

@fallenturtle

@zantax

It’s 2022, beam forming microphones are really good at that.

Assuming the teacher always stands in one spot. More money for something that can track their movements.

Anyway, I’m sure anytime now someone will create a BOM that can be used to prove me wrong.

No, you don’t have to stand in one spot, that’s why Alexa, if you are dumb enough to have one, can hear you from anywhere in the room, even over music or the tv.

I doubt it will do an accurate dictation job in a large noisy room. But this is all irrelevant because nobody wants to do this.

Nobody?

MSN

‘Cameras in Classrooms’ bill all but dead

I guess I’m wrong.

[fallenturtle]

@RTchoke

@fallenturtle

@RTchoke

I would say that admitting you did it, then giving an excuse as to why you are special and can do it but others cannot is not much of an apology.

Emphasis mine… where did she do that?

“In the excitement after I finished, because it was so much fun working with those kids, I took a picture, and that was a mistake. Protocols matter, and protecting our kids is the most important thing, and anything that can be perceived as undermining that is a mistake, and I apologize."

Put the first excuse in there also. The excuse she gave could also apply to anyone else in that school, but they can’t avail themselves of it. She’s sorry, not sorry and only after a week of backlash.

I put it in there for you.

I’m still not seeing the “not sorry” and claiming she is special stuff.

[RTchoke]

@fallenturtle

@RTchoke

@fallenturtle

@RTchoke

I would say that admitting you did it, then giving an excuse as to why you are special and can do it but others cannot is not much of an apology.

Emphasis mine… where did she do that?

“In the excitement after I finished, because it was so much fun working with those kids, I took a picture, and that was a mistake. Protocols matter, and protecting our kids is the most important thing, and anything that can be perceived as undermining that is a mistake, and I apologize."

Put the first excuse in there also. The excuse she gave could also apply to anyone else in that school, but they can’t avail themselves of it. She’s sorry, not sorry and only after a week of backlash.

I put it in there for you.

I’m still not seeing the “not sorry” and claiming she is special stuff.

What was the reasoning she used to take it off? Can the teachers and others use the same reasoning? Even CNN thought she was ridiculous with that crap reasoning.

Sorry, not sorry.

[Call_me_Ishmael]

@fallenturtle

@Call_me_Ishmael

@fallenturtle

@gooddad409

You have to wonder what they don’t want us knowing about to so strenuously object to parents being able to monitor the class rooms.

If you’re a conservative you should understand the idea of not spending public money on things that aren’t necessary. I know y’all (c) have been programmed to think otherwise, but not everything is a conspiracy theory.

Hahahahahahaha…

I’m a populist anyhow. The parents need to know what indoctrination is being foisted on their children. If the government can pay for addict needles, it can pay to save the children from the evil that progs teach.

Curriculum and syllabuses should be posted on line. I’d make that a state law if possible. Other than that, parents are (or should be depending on location) be able to visit classrooms. They can also talk to their kids about what they’re learning and there’s back to school nights and parent-teacher conferences. I believe these are sufficient to satisfy a normal non-conspiratorial parent (like myself).

If your (c) mistrust in a teacher is bad enough that you need to install a complex surveillance system in the classrooms then you should just pull your kids out and send them to private school or home school them.

We already do these things and this is how we know prog teachers are trying to indoctrinate with disgusting ideology.

[fallenturtle]

@Call_me_Ishmael

@fallenturtle

@Call_me_Ishmael

@fallenturtle

@gooddad409

You have to wonder what they don’t want us knowing about to so strenuously object to parents being able to monitor the class rooms.

If you’re a conservative you should understand the idea of not spending public money on things that aren’t necessary. I know y’all (c) have been programmed to think otherwise, but not everything is a conspiracy theory.

Hahahahahahaha…

I’m a populist anyhow. The parents need to know what indoctrination is being foisted on their children. If the government can pay for addict needles, it can pay to save the children from the evil that progs teach.

Curriculum and syllabuses should be posted on line. I’d make that a state law if possible. Other than that, parents are (or should be depending on location) be able to visit classrooms. They can also talk to their kids about what they’re learning and there’s back to school nights and parent-teacher conferences. I believe these are sufficient to satisfy a normal non-conspiratorial parent (like myself).

If your (c) mistrust in a teacher is bad enough that you need to install a complex surveillance system in the classrooms then you should just pull your kids out and send them to private school or home school them.

We already do these things and this is how we know prog teachers are trying to indoctrinate with disgusting ideology.

All five of them!

[zantax]

@fallenturtle

@Call_me_Ishmael

@fallenturtle

@Call_me_Ishmael

@fallenturtle

@gooddad409

You have to wonder what they don’t want us knowing about to so strenuously object to parents being able to monitor the class rooms.

If you’re a conservative you should understand the idea of not spending public money on things that aren’t necessary. I know y’all (c) have been programmed to think otherwise, but not everything is a conspiracy theory.

Hahahahahahaha…

I’m a populist anyhow. The parents need to know what indoctrination is being foisted on their children. If the government can pay for addict needles, it can pay to save the children from the evil that progs teach.

Curriculum and syllabuses should be posted on line. I’d make that a state law if possible. Other than that, parents are (or should be depending on location) be able to visit classrooms. They can also talk to their kids about what they’re learning and there’s back to school nights and parent-teacher conferences. I believe these are sufficient to satisfy a normal non-conspiratorial parent (like myself).

If your (c) mistrust in a teacher is bad enough that you need to install a complex surveillance system in the classrooms then you should just pull your kids out and send them to private school or home school them.

We already do these things and this is how we know prog teachers are trying to indoctrinate with disgusting ideology.

All five of them!

Spare me, I already linked the head of the LA school district endorsing it. Second largest district in the nation.

[Samm]

“Just talk to the students.”

All of them? At the end of each day?

“Public schools teaching CRT” “our schools have problems, but CRT is not one of them.”

I’m not talking about CRT per say, unless the admin is denying that its part of the curriculum. I’m talking about political bullying and general verbal abuse. That IS a problem and the few instances cited here is undoubtedly just the iceberg tip.

“Time, money, and dignity.”

What could take more time, money and loss of dignity than routinely interrogating students? … for any reason?

[Samm]

@fallenturtle

@Samm

@fallenturtle

@Samm

@fallenturtle

Okay, add a dedicated wifi system to the cost list. And you want to send and process this all in the cloud?

Schools … most schools … already have wifi and utilize the cloud.

Which would probably need to be expanded to cover the additional bandwidth. And that’s assuming this surveillance system uses their infrastructure. I would think the paranoid would be scared of the school tampering with the “evidence”.

So?
…

Is there a school district where the parents are that paranoid that they’d be willing to pay for all of this?

Probably. It wouldn’t cost much. Certainly not as much as a lawsuit … or two, or three, or ten.

[Samm]

@fallenturtle

More viable then a high tech AI driven surveillance system recording every class.

A wireless mic on each teacher is not particularly high tech.