How many debates will Biden actually participate in?

[Borgia_dude]

@thinkingman

@Borgia_dude

@thinkingman

you forgot:

“ Like the special counsel, Robert S. Mueller III, who released his findings in April 2019, the Senate report did not conclude that the Trump campaign engaged in a coordinated conspiracy with the Russian government — a fact that Republicans seized on to argue that there was “no collusion.”

But it certainly was with worth investigating, wasn’t it? There was enough smoke that it warranted an investigation, no?

no. it was absurd from the start, because the impetus came from conniving liar crook clinton

It did? Trump’s son meeting with a Russian to discuss “adoptions”, er no, scratch that, election dirt wasn’t anything to follow up on?

[rp5x5]

Leftists just repeat talking points and putting in time on a time clock. Might as well be talking to phone solicitors, or Robots.

What a miserable future they create for themselves.

[enki]

@rp5x5

Leftists just repeat talking points and putting in time on a time clock. Might as well be talking to phone solicitors, or Robots.

What a miserable future they create for themselves.

is this where you accuse posters here of being paid to post?

[thinkingman]

@Borgia_dude

@thinkingman

@Borgia_dude

@thinkingman

you forgot:

“ Like the special counsel, Robert S. Mueller III, who released his findings in April 2019, the Senate report did not conclude that the Trump campaign engaged in a coordinated conspiracy with the Russian government — a fact that Republicans seized on to argue that there was “no collusion.”

But it certainly was with worth investigating, wasn’t it? There was enough smoke that it warranted an investigation, no?

no. it was absurd from the start, because the impetus came from conniving liar crook clinton

It did? Trump’s son meeting with a Russian to discuss “adoptions”, er no, scratch that, election dirt wasn’t anything to follow up on?

no. thats not collusion

how about biden’s cokehead son getting 3.5 mil from corrupt Russia mayor‘s wife?

[Borgia_dude]

@thinkingman

@Borgia_dude

@thinkingman

@Borgia_dude

@thinkingman

you forgot:

“ Like the special counsel, Robert S. Mueller III, who released his findings in April 2019, the Senate report did not conclude that the Trump campaign engaged in a coordinated conspiracy with the Russian government — a fact that Republicans seized on to argue that there was “no collusion.”

But it certainly was with worth investigating, wasn’t it? There was enough smoke that it warranted an investigation, no?

no. it was absurd from the start, because the impetus came from conniving liar crook clinton

It did? Trump’s son meeting with a Russian to discuss “adoptions”, er no, scratch that, election dirt wasn’t anything to follow up on?

no. thats not collusion

So Trump lying multiple times about a meeting with Russia is not a reason to investigate further?

Wow!

[PurpnGold]

@thinkingman

no. thats not collusion

Roger Stone working with the hacker who stole emails? Collusion?

What about when Manafort gave internal polling data to Russia? Collusion?

[Phaedrus]

@Bill.in.PA

Yes, the mainstream media will ooh and ah if Biden is able to speak reasonably coherently for 90 minutes.

The mainstream media, and rational Americans, will be absolutely gobsmacked if Trump is able to speak reasonably coherently for 90 minutes.

FIFY.

[NuffSaid]

@PurpnGold

@thinkingman

no. thats not collusion

Roger Stone working with the hacker who stole emails? Collusion?

What about when Manafort gave internal polling data to Russia? Collusion?

Shh, those are examples of collusion.

[thinkingman]

@PurpnGold

@thinkingman

no. thats not collusion

Roger Stone working with the hacker who stole emails? Collusion?

What about when Manafort gave internal polling data to Russia? Collusion?

what does mueller think about those?

[DisturbedGuy]

Trump’s nose being up Putin’s butt takes on whole new meaning now that we know he’s broke doesn’t it?

[PurpnGold]

@thinkingman

what does mueller think about those?

He thought it was collusion but not conspiracy.

[thinkingman]

@PurpnGold

@thinkingman

what does mueller think about those?

He thought it was collusion but not conspiracy.

and that is incorrect

wow

just ignore the results, go with rachael maddow

[NuffSaid]

@PurpnGold

@thinkingman

what does mueller think about those?

He thought it was collusion but not conspiracy.

But, Mueller did not use that term “collusion”. He felt it was up to Congress to make that determination. And of course Congress was too busy hugging Bill Barr and Trump to follow up. They were too busy bowing to their King.

[Medicswife2002]

Wrong.

[thinkingman]

@NuffSaid

@PurpnGold

@thinkingman

what does mueller think about those?

He thought it was collusion but not conspiracy.

But, Mueller did not use that term “collusion”. He felt it was up to Congress to make that determination. And of course Congress was too busy hugging Bill Barr and Trump to follow up. They were too busy bowing to their King.

yeah thats the problem. too much “bowing”

it was muellers job to determine collusion or not. when he didnt much to the shock and dismay of the rage-hating media, then these kinds of nonsensical narratives arise

such as “no collusion found but there still may be some” which is plain political crap

[NuffSaid]

“rage-hating media”

Comedic gold.

[PeterGriffin]

Biden is going to pull out his wallet, peel off $750 and throw it Trump and say “Next years on me, Sport”.

[PurpnGold]

@thinkingman

it was muellers job to determine collusion or not.

No it was his job to determine conspiracy

[PurpnGold]

@Medicswife2002

Wrong

Someone didn’t read the Mueller report. Or the Senate report

[JayJay]

@thinkingman

@Borgia_dude

@thinkingman

you forgot:

“ Like the special counsel, Robert S. Mueller III, who released his findings in April 2019, the Senate report did not conclude that the Trump campaign engaged in a coordinated conspiracy with the Russian government — a fact that Republicans seized on to argue that there was “no collusion.”

But it certainly was with worth investigating, wasn’t it? There was enough smoke that it warranted an investigation, no?

no. it was absurd from the start, because the impetus came from conniving liar crook clinton

So the Republican-controlled Senate takes marching orders from Hillary Clinton?

Good to know.