Really you need someone to tell you how dui laws might affect you?

Again … the circumstances in ALL justified shoots are different. But your faith in left-wing loons like Bragg is refreshing. :wink:

1 Like

Over on Reddit the libs are wondering why HE gets to break the law (having a gun in the mall) and who made him judge, jury and exocutioner.

1 Like

Just stop.

2 Likes

The post I quoted implies he was a villain. Yes…. You attempted to get ahold of him in this very thread.

1 Like

So we have a basis for pushing people who murder.

Would a bat help Rittenhouse or the guy in the mall?. Should the cops rushed the guy in TX with a bat. Could you get any more obtuse, getting hard not to think you have a sub 90 iq.

1 Like

Amazing isn’t it?

Ok, then I’ll rephrase and state and no one who matters is going to make him a villain. Reddit nerds aside

1 Like

Did he actually break a law or just the mall policy?

No, it implies that libs (unjustly) made Mr. Rittenhouse into a villain.

Would have been nice if all those good guys with guns in Uvade hadn’t stood around with their thumbs up their asses…

1 Like

The post doesn’t say that very clearly, but from reading further I do see that’s what you meant. :vulcan_salute:

1 Like

Rittenhouse was another hero and another example I almost referenced. It was a travesty he was ever put on trial. Just like the bodega owner who killed his would be murderer.

They just dropped charges against him.

3 Likes

Sure would have genius. Welcome to what every one has been saying.

2 Likes

Seems like an admission that guns are better at killing than a knife or a bat.

And this is why we want them reduced.

1 Like

Well that’s kind of why I’m dubious that the solution to gun violence is “more good guys with guns”.

(Again since it has to be stated outright or else assumptions will be made…I’m a gun rights advocate and am not arguing for gun bans).

Now you know why citizens need guns.

4 Likes

Because you want victims less capable of defending themselves?

4 Likes