How Do You Think Corona Is Going To "End"

[CanadianJudo]

@Samm

@Tangible08

@Samm

Regardless of all the philosophical points one can come up with, a reduction of the population by 2.5% or even 10%, won’t hurt the species at all and could actually help it. You can find very little disagreement with the premise that there are already too many people for the good of the planet and nearly every living thing on it. That is my point.

And there is nothing simple about limiting birth rate without a totalitarian government. And that would be worse for humanity than procreating our selves out of a place at the dinner table.

Using contraceptives and making sure people are educated and women can work is enough to reduce the population growth to sustainable levels. No totalitarian government needed.

It hasn’t worked so far … because it’s voluntary.

Forced sterilization use to be quite popular in America.

till some people in Germany ruined it.

[Samm]

@WuWei

@Tangible08

@Samm

Regardless of all the philosophical points one can come up with, a reduction of the population by 2.5% or even 10%, won’t hurt the species at all and could actually help it. You can find very little disagreement with the premise that there are already too many people for the good of the planet and nearly every living thing on it. That is my point.

And there is nothing simple about limiting birth rate without a totalitarian government. And that would be worse for humanity than procreating our selves out of a place at the dinner table.

Using contraceptives and making sure people are educated and women can work is enough to reduce the population growth to sustainable levels. No totalitarian government needed.

Who said anything about totalitarian government?

I did, right there in the nested post. To achieve a negative birth rate globally, it would take totalitarian governments to force it upon the people … like China did a few decades back.

[Samm]

@CanadianJudo

when you start thinking of poor people as animal to be culled, bad thing happen.

Then don’t think that way. We’re not.

[CanadianJudo]

@Samm

@CanadianJudo

when you start thinking of poor people as animal to be culled, bad thing happen.

Then don’t think that way. We’re not.

someone brought up Mathus theory.
and I simply pointed out how horrible that theory worked for the Irish.

[WildRose]

Off topic.

Forced sterilization was popular in the entire western world at the time thanks to the thinking of Margaret Sanger and her cohorts.

Stop derailing the thread.

[Samm]

@CanadianJudo

I was talking about good old Malthus.
I don’t blame him he grew up during a pretty ■■■■ period of history.

Malthus was English, not German.

[WildRose]

Already pointed out, he moved to the next off topic derailment attempt.

[Samm]

@Tangible08

@WildRose

It’s simple biology and world history.

It’s social darwinism. You’re reducing the purpose of society to the survival of the species and those who are “most fit.”

The Coronavirus doesn’t know what your social status is.

[Samm]

@CanadianJudo

@WildRose

Stop moving the goal posts, you didn’t even answer your own question.

We’re discussing nature and you’re accusing us of Being Nazis.

You need to clean that bull ■■■■ up and either discuss and debate honestly or stay the ■■■■ out of it.

My point is when you start talking about “culling” the population and compare them to rabbits.
bad things tend to happen.

You are as confused as Tommy. Nobody was talking about culling anybody. We were talking about the Coronavirus culling the population, just like the Black Death, smallpox and the Spanish Flu have culled it in the past. Got it?

[Samm]

@Tangible08

@WildRose

Mealy mouthed BS.

By excusing it in such a way you give license to the killing of the unborn simply because they are inconvenient.

Even lower animals are better than that.

Nope, sorry. Giving a person domain over their internal organs doesn’t mean that I am forcing harm onto anyone.

By definition an abortion causes harm to someone. Every successful abortion results in the death of a human being. That is a fact that you cannot make disappear with euphemisms.

[WildRose]

“Completely Innocent Human Being”.

[Samm]

@CanadianJudo

@Samm

@Tangible08

@Samm

Regardless of all the philosophical points one can come up with, a reduction of the population by 2.5% or even 10%, won’t hurt the species at all and could actually help it. You can find very little disagreement with the premise that there are already too many people for the good of the planet and nearly every living thing on it. That is my point.

And there is nothing simple about limiting birth rate without a totalitarian government. And that would be worse for humanity than procreating our selves out of a place at the dinner table.

Using contraceptives and making sure people are educated and women can work is enough to reduce the population growth to sustainable levels. No totalitarian government needed.

It hasn’t worked so far … because it’s voluntary.

Forced sterilization use to be quite popular in America.

till some people in Germany ruined it.

It was never used upon the whole population … not even close.

Are you following the conversation or are you just sniping when something catches your eye?

[Samm]

@CanadianJudo

@Samm

@CanadianJudo

when you start thinking of poor people as animal to be culled, bad thing happen.

Then don’t think that way. We’re not.

someone brought up Mathus theory.
and I simply pointed out how horrible that theory worked for the Irish.

Yeah, that was you. Right after you said “how German of you.”

[Samm]

@WildRose

Already pointed out, he moved to the next off topic derailment attempt.

We are at least three times removed from the thread topic.

[WuWei]

@WildRose

More importantly, we were talking about how Nature does the culling.

And not trying to stop it. Alfie Evans.

[WuWei]

@CanadianJudo

Forced sterilization use to be quite popular in America.

No it didn’t.

[WuWei]

@Samm

@WuWei

@Tangible08

@Samm

Regardless of all the philosophical points one can come up with, a reduction of the population by 2.5% or even 10%, won’t hurt the species at all and could actually help it. You can find very little disagreement with the premise that there are already too many people for the good of the planet and nearly every living thing on it. That is my point.

And there is nothing simple about limiting birth rate without a totalitarian government. And that would be worse for humanity than procreating our selves out of a place at the dinner table.

Using contraceptives and making sure people are educated and women can work is enough to reduce the population growth to sustainable levels. No totalitarian government needed.

Who said anything about totalitarian government?

I did, right there in the nested post. To achieve a negative birth rate globally, it would take totalitarian governments to force it upon the people … like China did a few decades back.

I disagree.

[WuWei]

@CanadianJudo

@Samm

@CanadianJudo

when you start thinking of poor people as animal to be culled, bad thing happen.

Then don’t think that way. We’re not.

someone brought up Mathus theory.
and I simply pointed out how horrible that theory worked for the Irish.

Did it?

[Samson_Corwell]

@WuWei

There is no “cure” for a virus.

I’ve heard this before and I see no reason to believe it.

[WuWei]

@Samson_Corwell

@WuWei

There is no “cure” for a virus.

I’ve heard this before and I see no reason to believe it.

Name one.