When the President of the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside:
If they are holding an impeachment trial on the president then the chief justice is there. I don’t see anything about former, out of office, or anything. He was indicted as the president, he is being tried as the president.
Either that or the impeachment indictument is no longer valid.
Nope.
They can hold a trial (word from the constituion) but the Cheif Justice SHALL (word for the constition) preside.
Not sure what happens constitutionally if the cheif justice doesn’t want to preside. Guess you impeach him and install a new chief justice.
Chief. “i” before “e” except after “c” and neighbor and weigh.
Can you please link to the CIVILIAN impeach ment article passed by the house. Please and thank you.
The impeachment article passed by the house was for a person holding the office of PRESIDENT.
The senate trial is for a person that was impeached in the office of PRESIDENT.
They aren’t trying an ordinary citizen. President Donald J. Trump** was the sitting President at the time he was impeached and was not, and is not, an “ordinary citizen”.
Whether Senate, after having a trial, will convict (conviction vote with 2/3’s confirming), acquit (conviction vote with less than the 2/3’s threshold), or dismiss (vote after arguments by a simple majority) is up to the Senate.
.
.
.
.WW
Then you agree the Chief justice SHALL preside over the senate trial?
Then the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States shall preside.
And now since he is not president. Roberts demurred.
Leahy will do a fine job.
Allan
Especially when the constitution says they can’t, bill of attainder.
How can you hold a tril for a non president in the senate? Is there a new impeachment resolution passed by the house? Either the senate is holding trial for impeachment resolutions on THE PRESIDENT or they need a new resolution in the house.
By the “logic” on display here, they could impeach and try me. Or just try me.
No honest answers are forthcoming from the lefties aside from ‘
but we wannnnnaaaaa impeach him!’
If rules are created from wholecloth and the constitution tossed aside, so be it. Its how they roll, so bring on more preprogrammed nonsensical replies. Which brings me back to my first sentence. 
If they are trying him for the impeachment when he was President, Roberts can’t “demur”.
They have screwed this up.
See the Articles of Impeachment
Note how it begins:
“Impeaching Donald John Trump, President of the United States, for high crimes and misdemeanors.”
Seems to me, Donald John Trump is not the “President of the United States”, so how do you impeach a president, when he is not the president?
Additionally, our Constitution states: “The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments. When sitting for that Purpose, they shall be on Oath or Affirmation. When the President of the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside:”
So, according to the Articles of Impeachment against the “President of the United States”, Chief Justice Roberts is to preside. But, I hear tell that Senator Patrick Leahy will preside over “Impeaching Donald John Trump, President of the United States”, who is not really President of the United States as falsely declared on the face of the Democrat nitwits Articles of Impeachment, but if true, requires Chief Justice Roberts to preside.
Yup, you sure can’t make this stuff up. But hey, when the Keystone Cops are in charge ___ Mr. CICILLINE , Mr. TED LIEU of California, Mr. RASKIN, Mr. NADLER, as appears in the facially defective Articles of Impeachment ___ who knows what to expect?
JWK
Our socialist/fascist revolutionaries, which now control the Democrat Party Leadership, are known for accusing others of what they themselves are guilty of.
That Donald John Trump, President of the United States, is impeached for high crimes and misdemeanors and that the following article of impeachment be exhibited to the United States Senate:
So Donald John Trump, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES is impeached.
Yet the trial in the senate will NOT be for the president of the United States?
Hmmm
Guess they need a NEW impeachment resolution if Cheif (yes just for your sneaky) won’t preside.
https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-resolution/24/text
So the impeachment resolution IS for the office of president.
The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments. When sitting for that Purpose, they shall be on Oath or Affirmation. When the President of the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside: And no Person shall be convicted without the Concurrence of two thirds of the Members present.
Someone needs to show the Cheif (yes again for you sneaky) justice the indictment and the constitution.
No need to do it “just for me”.
Sit back and watch
Illegitimate. They have screwed this all up. And Roberts gets off yet again.
He may be the worst “Cheif” in history.
Article I, section 9, clause 3
“No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed.”
They are handing Trump his defense.
Snow, please don’t put words in my mouth even phrasing it as a question.
I’m fine with the Chief Justice presiding because President Trump** was President at the time of impeachment. Also fine with the Senate and the Chief Justice determining that ex-President impeachment don’t require the Chief Justice to preside as the Constitution is not clear on that point.
Saying that someone impeached as President whose trial doesn’t happen until the individual leaves office is not an “ordinary citizen” has nothing to do with who presides.
.
.
.
.WW
