Then we agree. Which I was fairly certain of all along. See, no Trump myth.

Were they?

You tell me.

I asked you. As far as I can tell, they were and the process was followed.

I will offer you this; I believe their was less fraud in thos election than other thanks to President Trump.

I did.

What conviction?

The bar she set was “several million Democrats who do not believe the election was fair,” not that there was evidence.

1 Like

Well then how does she know that? She presented it as evidence.

No … you took her remarks as presented evidence. The evidence is the polling statistic that 8% of Democrats believe the election was unfair, not that those Democrats had evidence that it was unfair.

And that’s her evidence for her claim. That they had questions, not that it was unfair.

Not questions, belief.

I have no problem with you trying your hand at defense attorney, but maybe you need some time in the minor leagues before you try to take on the Joe Jamail of Cowboy Society.

Attention to detail.

Yes … attention to detail. Belief is not reliant on either questions or evidence.

And who the ■■■■ is Joe Jamail of Cowboy Society and why does his opinion count in this discussion?

Now you’re prosecuting? Just let it go and get back in your igloo.

Taking this a bit personally, aren’t we?

1 Like

:rofl: Not hardly.

Sure appears so to me. At least that’s what I believe.

1 Like

Evidence? Questions?

You can’t let it go, can you?

No. Can you?

My point: No Trump Myth. Someone who does not support President Trump was trying to tell those of us who do how we “really” think. That never works well, never ends well.

3 Likes