WuWei
103
Which requires what? I see no contradiction, thatâs pretty much what I said.
Not resist. RESIST!
legally. No legitimacy. Do you think they arenât in prison when they go to prison?
to have real being whether material or spiritual
Yes.
WuWei
104
Then you have both accepted its authority and legitimized it by actively participating in the contract beyond the minimum obligations.
Iâm having a hard time getting my point across, and I understand that itâs my own fault - the words I am using are not making my position clear.
I accept the legitimacy and authority of the government. I do not accept that I am in any way under an obligation to the government.
Maybe that is clearer.
Well, whatâs the difference?
Is resistance (or RESISTANCE) defined by not following the laws I donât agree with, or shooting people?
I think that many of them honestly believe that they wonât end up going to prison, right up until the gavel bangs for the last time.
I have already said that I believe the government is legitimate - and under further thought, I agree that I am, at least to an extent, under its authority.
WuWei
107
That is the obligation.
Fighting. Shooting. Blowing â â â â up. Changing it.
I disagree.
WuWei
108
Your side of the contract.
WuWei
109
In exchange for the party of the 1st part (people) allowing the party of the 2nd part (gov) to form this government and exercise authority over people, gov promises to comply with the terms set forth herein.
People promises to recognize govâs authority and submit to rules formed by this authority, to pay taxes and not shoot gov.
I do see what youâre saying - but I keep getting hung up on the âsubmit to authorityâ part.
Does âsubmitting to authorityâ mean recognizing the power of the authority, or does it mean something more fundemental?
There are laws that I agree with, and laws that I donât agree with. There are laws that I generally follow, and laws that I often break.
Does submitting to authority (in terms of power) mean submitting to an authority, in terms of ethics?
WuWei
111
You recognize you are breaking. That is what submitting to authority means in this context.
Of course. Thatâs the point - I choose to break them.
Does submitting to authority mean that I have to believe that breaking the law is wrong, or just that I could be punished for it?
WuWei
113
And you recognize you are breaking and accept punishment.
Well, thatâs the problem I have with the terminology. It could mean either.
What do you think?
WuWei
116
Is the punishment part of the law?
WuWei
118
Does that help?
How about it requires you recognize that you are breaking?
WuWei
119
Or you recognize the authority of gov to make laws in the first place.
Any government has the authority to make laws, itâs inherent to the definition of a government.
WuWei
121
Good point. From where does this government derive that authority?
Do all governments derive their authority from the same place?