He said opportunity.
Seems like it is only regressive if a man identifying as a woman is excluded.
No, they are regressive by their very nature.
Nothing funny about this. Another biological woman loses an opportunity while the left fawns.
You could have just said woman.
Great…now he’s just gonna double down…
What do you mean? These pageants can be pretty demanding. I just hope she doesn’t peter out. The last thing we need is to see her peter out. Am I right?
Porning up a six year old so her mother wins fifty bucks is what feminists have struggled for, lo these many decades.
DMK:Seems like it is only regressive if a man identifying as a woman is excluded.
No, they are regressive by their very nature.
Why?
…
He isn’t a woman at all.
There are so many things that make up what a woman is. Identifying as one does not make you a woman.
I get that these folks are looking for a place to fit in and want nothing more than to be seen as normal.
The thing is, they are not going to fit in as a woman or a man. They are a “cross over”.
Porning up a six year old so her mother wins fifty bucks is what feminists have struggled for, lo these many decades.
If women can’t objectify themselves, will they ever truly be free?
No, they are regressive by their very nature.
How so?
Freedom begins when adults empanel in public to rate the looks of dolled up first graders. For money.
Porning up a six year old so her mother wins fifty bucks is what feminists have struggled for, lo these many decades.
Why is that any of your business?
altair1013:Since they don’t like to mention she has weenie, maybe they can call it a sheenie?
Lol that hurt bad!
Sorry. It was probably the wong thing to say.
tzu:Porning up a six year old so her mother wins fifty bucks is what feminists have struggled for, lo these many decades.
Why is that any of your business?
It’s not but if some conservatives are really going to say they’re defending women by pushing to eliminate trans women from beauty pageants, they are working overtime to not be taken seriously.
Especially since this isn’t even an area where trans women would have an advantage.
Freedom begins when adults empanel in public to rate the looks of dolled up first graders. For money.
It’s also none of your business.
tzu:Porning up a six year old so her mother wins fifty bucks is what feminists have struggled for, lo these many decades.
If women can’t objectify themselves, will they ever truly be free?
If you decide for them, no.
Odin’s forgotten Raven, ma’am, try that on a noob or somethin’.
How so?
A bunch of dolled-up teenagers standing on stage in bikinis, being “judged” on their physical beauty by middle-aged men?
You tell me. What isn’t regressive about it?
It’s not but if some conservatives are really going to say they’re defending women by eliminating trans women from beauty pageants, they are working overtime to not be taken seriously.
I don’t take a trans seriously nor will I defend them because of how they identify.
You could have just said woman.
I never imagined we’d live in an age where we had to clarify it.
What isn’t regressive about it?
It’s pro choice. If a woman chooses to show herself off, it’s her call. Not yours. Or any man’s.