House judiciary committee approves articles of impeachment against President trump

Sknyluv · 2019-12-13T18:34:00.226Z

WuWei:

Sknyluv:

Then don’t elect a man like Trump.

Then don’t run a hag like Hildawg

Explain the republican primaries then. Trump is what y’all wanted. This is your guy. Deal with the consequences.

Kelby · 2019-12-13T18:42:12.810Z

WuWei:

Kelby:

Snow96:

PurpnGold:

17 people who either saw the plan for murder, planned the murder or saw the murder. That murderer would be in prison.

Can you give me links to the 17 witnesses testifying to anything other than “heard it from a friend who heard it from a friend”?

Please and thank you.

the 17 witnesses never saw it, herd it, or herd planning of it.

90% wouldn’t be allowed to testify in a criminal trial.

Hmm, I’m pretty sure sworn testimony is evidence. It’s up to the jurors to decide whether it’s compelling.

So Kaplan’s sworn testimony is evidence of what? What is Vinman’s?

That depends. They all had a role/expertise on one kind or another in the Ukrianian matter, just little little pieces of a puzzle.

A puzzle that fits together perfectly, it turns out.

WuWei · 2019-12-13T18:43:22.111Z

Sknyluv:

WuWei:

Sknyluv:

Then don’t elect a man like Trump.

Then don’t run a hag like Hildawg

Explain the republican primaries then. Trump is what y’all wanted. This is your guy. Deal with the consequences.

Hildawg would have crushed anybody but the King of Trolls. It was her turn.

WuWei · 2019-12-13T18:44:32.116Z

Kelby:

WuWei:

Kelby:

Snow96:

PurpnGold:

17 people who either saw the plan for murder, planned the murder or saw the murder. That murderer would be in prison.

Can you give me links to the 17 witnesses testifying to anything other than “heard it from a friend who heard it from a friend”?

Please and thank you.

the 17 witnesses never saw it, herd it, or herd planning of it.

90% wouldn’t be allowed to testify in a criminal trial.

Hmm, I’m pretty sure sworn testimony is evidence. It’s up to the jurors to decide whether it’s compelling.

So Kaplan’s sworn testimony is evidence of what? What is Vinman’s?

That depends. They all had a role/expertise on one kind or another in the Ukrianian matter, just little little pieces of a puzzle.

A puzzle that fits together perfectly, it turns out.

What was Kaplan’s evidence of?

Nemesis · 2019-12-13T18:45:33.519Z

Snow96:

Yup.

Vote this morning for show

They could have done it last night but they wanted it to be seen by people.

What a joke. If it were truely for non political reasons, they would have held the vote last night instead of a sudden adjournment with the words we vote in the morning.

Impeachment by its very nature is political!!!

komobu · 2019-12-13T18:46:16.033Z

Is he impeached if the Senate finds him Not Guilty?

Kelby · 2019-12-13T18:47:41.569Z

WuWei:

Kelby:

WuWei:

Kelby:

Snow96:

PurpnGold:

17 people who either saw the plan for murder, planned the murder or saw the murder. That murderer would be in prison.

Can you give me links to the 17 witnesses testifying to anything other than “heard it from a friend who heard it from a friend”?

Please and thank you.

the 17 witnesses never saw it, herd it, or herd planning of it.

90% wouldn’t be allowed to testify in a criminal trial.

Hmm, I’m pretty sure sworn testimony is evidence. It’s up to the jurors to decide whether it’s compelling.

So Kaplan’s sworn testimony is evidence of what? What is Vinman’s?

That depends. They all had a role/expertise on one kind or another in the Ukrianian matter, just little little pieces of a puzzle.

A puzzle that fits together perfectly, it turns out.

What was Kaplan’s evidence of?

Who?

…

BlueTex · 2019-12-13T18:50:49.088Z

komobu:

Is he impeached if the Senate finds him Not Guilty?

Yes…

WorldWatcher · 2019-12-13T19:12:56.271Z

komobu:

Is he impeached if the Senate finds him Not Guilty?

Yes
.
.
.
.WW, PHS

biggestal99 · 2019-12-13T20:03:19.142Z

komobu:

Is he impeached if the Senate finds him Not Guilty?

Yep. Impeached and acquitted.

Allan

LouC · 2019-12-13T20:56:21.869Z

He is still an impeached president.

WuWei · 2019-12-13T21:15:16.298Z

komobu:

Is he impeached if the Senate finds him Not Guilty?

Yes.

Impeachment
Convicted
Removed from office

Three distinct things.

SixFoot · 2019-12-13T21:47:46.344Z

hindsight:

Looks like someone’s been triggered.

Yes, yes you have, for 3 years and counting. Atta boy, lib.

hindsight · 2019-12-13T23:27:23.551Z

SixFoot:

hindsight:

Looks like someone’s been triggered.

Yes, yes you have, for 3 years and counting. Atta boy, lib.

Aw, frothing over Trump being impeached isn’t getting his supporters anywhere. Tough times to be a Trump supporter. Maybe next time pick a better candidate, lib.

SixFoot · 2019-12-14T00:19:55.609Z

So you’ve completely lost it. That was quick and easy. You’re flailing after me at this point.

hindsight · 2019-12-14T00:52:31.001Z

SixFoot:

So you’ve completely lost it. That was quick and easy. You’re flailing after me at this point.

You’ve really got me now.

WildRose · 2019-12-14T06:37:49.551Z

Drag it out an extra day for effect and more media madhouse I mean coverage.

Ex-Pat · 2019-12-14T07:07:04.225Z

Did anyone see video of the vote being called? Louie Gohmert interrupted to ask the vote caller to clarify whether she heard his vote. Had to be 100% sure Trump heard him vote “no.” He had a really fake sad look on his face during the whole process. What an idiot. Hope Trump has a nice tweet about him.

Around 3.48 in the video. Standard YouTube warning.

Camp · 2019-12-14T10:20:41.808Z

It will be a delight to have the vote Wednesday and have this election 2020 preview sent over to the Senate where the matter will be properly adjudicated.

The House secret bunker show is almost over.

LouC · 2019-12-14T14:14:36.787Z

Ex-Pat:

Did anyone see video of the vote being called? Louie Gohmert interrupted to ask the vote caller to clarify whether she heard his vote. Had to be 100% sure Trump heard him vote “no.” He had a really fake sad look on his face during the whole process. What an idiot. Hope Trump has a nice tweet about him.

Around 3.48 in the video. Standard YouTube warning.

Watch the full House Judiciary Committee vote on impeachment - YouTube

Yeah I watched it. Thing is he prefaced his “no” vote on the First Article with some idiotic comment so I guess he needed to clarify that it was a “no” vote. He didn’t do that again on the vote on the Second Article.

There you have it America, 17 GOPER’s willfully elevating Obese Donald above the law, above the U.S. Constitution.

Be proud of their spineless complicity in proving to Obese Donald that he can do anything he wants as president and there will be no consequences.

Pretty much all that is left is for Moscow Mitch to conduct his sham trial in the Senate and the GOPER’s there to put the signed, sealed, and delivered on it with their spineless votes to acquit.