Hopefully Trump keeps promise to end birthright citizenship for children born to illegal entrant foreign nationals

[Ben_Natuf]

@Samm

. Those who wrote the 14 Amendment did not mention allegiance.

They most certainly did, and John has posted their words from the Congressional record over and over… did you even bother to read them?

@Samm

there was no such thing as an illegal immigrant,

that’s not true. If it were there could not have been an alien and sedition act.

[johnwk2]

@Samm

Those who wrote the 14 Amendment did not mention allegiance.

From the first few paragraphs of the OP:

Let us examine the stated meaning of “and subject to the jurisdiction thereof” from voices of acknowledged authority.

John A. Bingham, considered the architect of the 14th Amendment, remarks on the intended meaning of “jurisdiction” as it appears in the amendment:

“I find no fault with the introductory clause, which is simply declaratory of what is written in the Constitution, that every human being born within the jurisdiction of the United States of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is, in the language of your Constitution itself, a natural born citizen…” Congressional Globe, 39th Congress (March 9th,1866)

Why must you repeatedly make stuff up and even lie, in order to make your case?

[johnwk2]

@WuWei

(Emphasis added.) Appellants argue at the outset that undocumented aliens, because of their immigration status, are not “persons within the jurisdiction” of the State of Texas, and that they therefore have no right to the equal protection of Texas law. We reject this argument.

Plyler v Doe

See: A myth is born. Plyler v. Doe ruled citizenship for offspring of illegal aliens

[johnwk2]

@Samm

Why do you repeatedly post the same walls of text over and over and over

I do so because “A Lie Can Travel Halfway Around the World While the Truth Is Putting On Its Shoes.” Author unknown.

Why do you repeatedly misrepresent truth and facts to make your case?

[WuWei]

They already have.

[WuWei]

They are in the jurisdiction of Texas. But not the US.

Got it.

[WuWei]

Might want to do a little research.

[WuWei]

@Ben_Natuf

name a case where it was granted to the child of illegal aliens.

All of them. It’s not “granted”, they simply are.

You do realize they are citizens now, right?

[WuWei]

What?

[WuWei]

@Ben_Natuf

No-one has claimed the children of illegal aliens are not qualified to be President.

They are.

[WuWei]

The brown babies stay citizens.

[johnwk2]

@WuWei

The brown babies stay citizens.

Your racist comment is noted.

[johnwk2]

@WuWei

Might want to do a little research.

So, get with it

See: A myth is born. Plyler v. Doe ruled citizenship for offspring of illegal aliens

[WuWei]

@johnwk2

@WuWei

The brown babies stay citizens.

Your racist comment is noted.

I love brown babies. I have one.

[Ben_Natuf]

maybe you should read the thread

[Ben_Natuf]

too different things.

[WuWei]

[biggestal99]

@Ben_Natuf

yes, that is the current policy

the 14th amendment is not a policy.

its an amendment.

Allan

[WuWei]

8 U.S. Code § 1401 isn’t “policy” either.

[biggestal99]

@WuWei

8 U.S. Code § 1401 isn’t “policy” either.

its been around since 1952. a mere 72 years.

Allan