Axxowiz
150
Anything can happen but if he’s at 33% he will be in the top two. If the field is very crowded he’s very likely to win.
Look at the people below him Sanders, Harris, and Warren. All three of those will split the votes which is how we got Trump overcrowded field. Biden is the only moderate in the top 5.
You all are putting a lot of eggs in that basket.
New voter ID laws would hurt the Democrats if implemented in 2020, I saw that the voter fraud commission comes out with their report on 22 December, a Christmas present for the American people I hope.
From the sounds of it, Hubers basket is big.
Jezcoe
154
It is doubtful that that will be earth shattering also.
Of course. All the same, I can imagine getting smacked in the face by stepping on the rakes called republican scandal mongering, has got to be getting old by now.
Yes, that’s the standard isn’t it.
Hey, Charlie Brown never got to kick that damned football either.
Don’t forget revenge! “Some” libs on this forum would love to inflict revenge on Trumpists. 
gwhit
159
She barely lost to the second worst polling POTUS nominee in history, because she was so unpopular is only reason a idiot like Trump was able to con system and win. If it was a better Dem vs Trump Trump would be still going ahead with TrumpTv station as he planed.
gwhit
160
Trump did not put them into play Hillary was one who drove them away. If she was not so bad then idiot like Trump would not had even a hint of winning except for his brain dead cult.
conan
162
See that is where you’re mistaken if you think Hillary drove em away. In 2012 I said Romey should go after voters alone that I-80 corridor. But again libs laughed.
As for who drove em away…it was democrat party by ignoring em.
Samm
163
That is purely your opinion not fact. However, what is relevant, is that all three of the named personalities (only two of which have a show on FOX) have said they are not Republicans. You may choose to not believe them, but that has nothing to do with me or what I choose to believe.
But regardless of what you believe, you should be forewarned … calling any one of those three individuals a liar in this Forum is a bannable offense.
Samm
164
It’s gratifying to know that my efforts here are not without effect.
C_Actor
165
Even if everything you say is right (it’s not), your goofball hair splitting between “republican media” and “pro-republican media” is ridiculous. Your distinction without a difference is rejected.
The democrats didn’t ignore them, Hillary herself addressed them as the left truly feels about them aka “Deplorables”. All one needs to do to see how the democratic party has swiftboated its former base is to look at Bernie Sanders views on immigration before he ran as a democrat, and how he had to change them in order to possibly be the democratic nominee.
“If poverty is increasing and if wages are going down, I don’t know why we need millions of people to be coming into this country as guest workers who will work for lower wages than American workers and drive wages down even lower than they are now,.” Sanders 2007
“Open borders?” “No, that’s a Koch brothers proposal.” The idea, he argued, is a right-wing scheme meant to flood the US with cheap labor and depress wages for native-born workers. “I think from a moral responsibility, we’ve got to work with the rest of the industrialized world to address the problems of international poverty,” he conceded, “but you don’t do that by making people in this country even poorer.” Sanders 2015
Figuratively speaking he was then placed a safe space by the democrats and told these views are no longer acceptable. Since then Bernie has changed his tone on immigration, as well as started making the left’s endless accusations on everything is racist and the ad nauseam cliche - white privilege. But before 2016 he had spent his career with the same message, which was to protect American workers from cheap labor.
He isn’t the only one, and there has been many who has had to change their views one of them is Economist Paul Krugman who’s article I highly suggest on the NYT’s (Notes on immigration).
https://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2006/03/27/notes-on-immigration/
“Immigration is an intensely painful topic for a liberal like myself”
“My second negative point is that immigration reduces the wages of domestic workers who compete with immigrants. That’s just supply and demand: we’re talking about large increases in the number of low-skill workers relative to other inputs into production, so it’s inevitable that this means a fall in wages. Mr. Borjas and Mr. Katz have to go through a lot of number-crunching to turn that general proposition into specific estimates of the wage impact, but the general point seems impossible to deny.”
2 Likes
BlueTex
167
You mean the voter fraud commission that Trump disbanded in January?
They were calling for her to be President in 2016 before Obama even finished his first term. They just think the rest of us are stupid and have short memories.
If you remember, they were all giddy about making history by electing our first Black President (as if race was a qualification), and kept saying how they were going to do it again when we elected the first woman President. :barf:
