Hildawg Deposed

[TheDoctorIsIn]

Intent to commit what crime?

Intending to circumvent the FOIA isn’t a crime.

[WildRose]

No it isn’t. It’s a crime to put official communications containing classified or confidential information on a private server.

[TheDoctorIsIn]

Well, that’s not quite right either.

But how does that “bombshell” email prove she intended to put classified information on her server?

[Samm]

@TheDoctorIsIn

@Samm

How about the fix was in as soon as Bill Clinton got on Loretta Lynch’s plane for a “quick hello.”

So you can’t come up with a single “regular” person in history to be criminally charged for unintentional spillage.

I am not surprised.

No other case matters. Hillary violated the law and Comey/Lynch let her get away with it. Big surprise after the clandestine airplane meeting, right?

[TheDoctorIsIn]

So, you want Clinton to be prosecuted for a “crime” that no one else has ever been prosecuted for?

That doesn’t seem very fair.

[Samm]

@TheDoctorIsIn

So, you want Clinton to be prosecuted for a “crime” that no one else has ever been prosecuted for?

That doesn’t seem very fair.

The law is the law regardless of what may have happened in other cases. If you don’t like the law, change it, but don’t ignore it just because it may have been ignored in the past.

[TheDoctorIsIn]

@Samm

The law is the law regardless of what may have happened in other cases. If you don’t like the law, change it, but don’t ignore it just because it may have been ignored in the past.

Do you know why the Supreme Court held that scienter is required?

[LucyLou]

@Samm

@TheDoctorIsIn

So, you want Clinton to be prosecuted for a “crime” that no one else has ever been prosecuted for?

That doesn’t seem very fair.

The law is the law regardless of what may have happened in other cases. If you don’t like the law, change it, but don’t ignore it just because it may have been ignored in the past.

Lol.

[westaussie]

Haven’t they?

[westaussie]

Where has it been proved that she broke the law? Does the presumption of innocence not apply to H Clinton?

[westaussie]

Is there proof that they did?

[westaussie]

Can you think of any in the current administration who could be prosecuted for the same offence?

[kingarthur65]

@Samm

@kingarthur65

@Samm

There is zero doubt that Hillary mishandled classified materials with her unauthorized server and her unauthorized cell phone. There is also zero doubt the she had her server scrubbed after it was subpoenaed. Her guilt is not in question, what is in question is why did Comey and Loretta Lynch not prosecute her.

Jared and Ivanka both use private email accounts for official business.
They both use an encrypted messaging service, Whatsapp to communicate. Those communications, by design, are automatically erased. It is the feature of the app. There is no question that both are using the app for this feature of erasing communications.

Jared and Ivanka are doing exactly what you are accusing Hillary to have done. It is ongoing. Should they be called to testify about their use of private email accounts and unauthorized messaging apps?

The key words were “mishandled classified materials” and “destroyed subpoenaed items.” Jared and Ivanka are not accused of those things so far as we know.

They are destroying communications every day. According to their lawyer, they are using Wharsapo for communicating eith foreign officials. The reason to use WhatsApp is because communications are automatically erased.

[WildRose]

No they aren’t, I use what’sapp every day and have years of saved conversations.

[kingarthur65]

You’re using it wrong.
Jared’s lawyer said he took screenshots of pertinent conversations and emailed them to himself. Other than that the conversations were automatically deleted.
It’s also mentioned in the Mueller report that some whit house aides use an unauthorized messaging app that deleted their conversations.
It is used for this purpose.

[WildRose]

No I’m not “using it wrong”.

I can go through my contacts and look at years worth of conversations, they are not auto deleted.

[Samm]

@TheDoctorIsIn

@Samm

The law is the law regardless of what may have happened in other cases. If you don’t like the law, change it, but don’t ignore it just because it may have been ignored in the past.

Do you know why the Supreme Court held that scienter is required?

So if one person is not prosecuted for a certain crime, nobody can be? Absurd.

[Samm]

@kingarthur65

@Samm

@kingarthur65

@Samm

There is zero doubt that Hillary mishandled classified materials with her unauthorized server and her unauthorized cell phone. There is also zero doubt the she had her server scrubbed after it was subpoenaed. Her guilt is not in question, what is in question is why did Comey and Loretta Lynch not prosecute her.

Jared and Ivanka both use private email accounts for official business.
They both use an encrypted messaging service, Whatsapp to communicate. Those communications, by design, are automatically erased. It is the feature of the app. There is no question that both are using the app for this feature of erasing communications.

Jared and Ivanka are doing exactly what you are accusing Hillary to have done. It is ongoing. Should they be called to testify about their use of private email accounts and unauthorized messaging apps?

The key words were “mishandled classified materials” and “destroyed subpoenaed items.” Jared and Ivanka are not accused of those things so far as we know.

They are destroying communications every day. According to their lawyer, they are using Wharsapo for communicating eith foreign officials. The reason to use WhatsApp is because communications are automatically erased.

Destroying private communications is not a crime unless it is the subject of a subpoena.

[kingarthur65]

@Samm

@kingarthur65

@Samm

@kingarthur65

@Samm

There is zero doubt that Hillary mishandled classified materials with her unauthorized server and her unauthorized cell phone. There is also zero doubt the she had her server scrubbed after it was subpoenaed. Her guilt is not in question, what is in question is why did Comey and Loretta Lynch not prosecute her.

Jared and Ivanka both use private email accounts for official business.
They both use an encrypted messaging service, Whatsapp to communicate. Those communications, by design, are automatically erased. It is the feature of the app. There is no question that both are using the app for this feature of erasing communications.

Jared and Ivanka are doing exactly what you are accusing Hillary to have done. It is ongoing. Should they be called to testify about their use of private email accounts and unauthorized messaging apps?

The key words were “mishandled classified materials” and “destroyed subpoenaed items.” Jared and Ivanka are not accused of those things so far as we know.

They are destroying communications every day. According to their lawyer, they are using Wharsapo for communicating eith foreign officials. The reason to use WhatsApp is because communications are automatically erased.

Destroying private communications is not a crime unless it is the subject of a subpoena.

Presidential Records Act says otherwise.

[Smyrna]

@TheDoctorIsIn

On the topic of the stupid populism argument:

If Clinton got off easy because she’s an “elite”, I’m sure you guys can come up with some examples of regular non-military individuals who were criminally prosecuted for unintentional spillage.

Just one will do.

If that was pertinent truth, I would but it’s a lie. Everything Hillary did…she was fully aware of and planned every step of the corrupt, illegal way.