A federal judge Monday granted a request from conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch to have former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton sit for a sworn deposition to answer questions about her use of a private email server to conduct government business.
Is there no end to the madness? I’d gladly trade a Hildawg today for a Strzok tomorrow.
From the article it is unclear who would be making up the questions.
I sure thought that after the FBI investigation all of this would be past history.
I knew that JW was waiting on this. I certainly did not expect any Judge to rule this way.
Condolences to the judge’s family over the loss of their loved one to suicide…
she will refuse, she will be found in contempt. she will have her law licence yanked and be disbarred, which will mean nothing to her since the last time she used it she left fingerprints… can’t have that.
I want both.
Lamberth also granted Judicial Watch’s request to depose former Clinton chief of staff Cheryl Mills, IT specialist Paul Combetta who was involved in deleting Clinton’s emails, as well as Brett Gittleson and Yvette Jacks, who were State Department officials familiar with Clinton’s private email server.
Judicial Watch also wanted to question Clinton and Mills about government talking points in the aftermath of the 2012 Benghazi attack. Lamberth said that while they “cannot be questioned about the underlying actions taken after the Benghazi attack,” they can face questions regarding "their knowledge of the existence of any emails, documents, or text messages related to the Benghazi attack."
Oh, oh…and just befor Mini-Mike asks her to be his VP? Oh, oh… 
haha. good. maybe this is the “we’ll all hang” thing playing out
Will that be the 560,457th Bengazi inquiry?
No refunds, little Mikey. lol
…and FINALLY…an honest, unbiased, inquiry where there’s no hiding material facts…if…the lawyers pursue the right course of questioning?
And if she’s found not to have done anything wrong…Will it be a deep state cover up?..Is guilt the only acceptable outcome?
Nope, Barr will demand she testify another 7 times.
What does Barr have to do with this?
Does a Judicial Watch rep do the questioning?..If so, how is that unbiased?
He’s the head of the DOJ, he can do anything he wants.
To him (as well as other R’s), Hillary is the true enemy of the people. She needs to be destroyed.
If we get the opportunity to witness any of it, what’s not provided…will answer your question.
Yeah, this has zero to do with Barr.
I’m sure he’ll stay out of it.
So am I. Unless of course crimes come to light in her deposition.
So, when nothing comes of the deposition, then what? She last testified in 2015. That was 5 years ago. How long should this be drug out? Is Ken Starr in charge?
Its a waste of time by uber biased Judicial Watch who just want to continually drag the enemy of the Republicans through the mud. All to pander to AM radio.
