High court seems chilly to ‘race neutral’ reading of Voting Rights Act

The good news is that the Supreme Court is evidently not going to embrace Alabama’s implausible reading of Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act.

The bad news is that they are likely to come up with a reading that will present more barriers to the enforcement of Section 2.

Now while I agree with a substantial majority of the current court’s jurisprudence, we part ways at the Voting Rights Act.

The Supreme Court should never have stayed the judgement of the three Judge district court panel.

Instead, it should have simply summarily affirmed the judgement of the three Judge district court panel which was entirely consistent with long standing Supreme Court precedent and entirely consistent with Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act.

So while their likely judgement in this case won’t be a total disaster, neither will it be helpful and it is clearly unnecessary.

The Chief Justice dissented from the original application for a stay. Hopefully, one of the other conservative Justices will switch positions and the District Court will be upheld. Probably won’t see a decision in this case until well into 2023.

However, after reviewing oral arguments, they clearly are not going to embrace Alabama’s reading.

Link to transcript of oral argument.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/audio/2022/21-1086

Link to audio of oral argument.

I’m quite impressed with KBJ’s performance.

1 Like

She used the conservative “constitutional originalist” stance against them. Impressive

1 Like

and the opinion is in. Roberts and Kavanaugh uphold the VRA and send Alabama backing to drawing board.

SCOTUS still holds a few surprises for me.

Allan

Didn’t see this thread, just posted an OP on this.

Oh hell, this mine, forget about this.

:smile:

2 Likes

In any event, despite my reservations in the OP, we ended up with the best possible result.

This is a great example of what thought stream predictions are really worth at the end of the day. :wink:

Actually, my prediction was on target, other than not expected so broad a reading in favor of the Respondents.

Link to Opinion of the Court in ALLEN, ALABAMA SECRETARY OF STATE, ET AL. v. MILLIGAN ET AL.

Held: The Court affirms the District Court’s determination that plaintiffs demonstrated a reasonable likelihood of success on their claim that HB1 violates §2.

ROBERTS, C. J., delivered the opinion of the Court, except as to Part III–B–1. SOTOMAYOR, KAGAN, and JACKSON, JJ., joined that opinion in full, and KAVANAUGH, J., joined except for Part III–B–1. KAVANAUGH, J., filed an opinion concurring in all but Part III–B–1. THOMAS, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which GORSUCH, J., joined, in which BARRETT, J., joined as to Parts II and III, and in which ALITO, J., joined as to Parts IIA and II–B. ALITO, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which GORSUCH, J., joined.

What this essentially means is that Alabama is going to have to draw a map that will produce a second black district.

Glad to see that at least Roberts and Kavanaugh are not willing to bury Section 2.

its a wonderful day in America.

VRA upheld as constitutional. (well at least part of it)

Allan

I went ahead and flagged this thread for merger into the other thread.

Why is it “shocking”?

Kavanaugh changed his mind.

one of the original stayers and then upholds the district court.

Allan

Stayers?

kavanaugh stayed the district ruling then upheld their ruling.

that was a major pleasant surprise to me. maybe @Safiel has a different take.

Allan

Do you seriously not know how this works?

What does this do to the tHeY rAciSt! narrative?

1 Like

Read the decision, and Thomas dissent. Thomas makes some very good points. Especially around how the 2nd minority district would be created and why.

1 Like

from a news article:

“Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh flipped sides in a pivotal voting rights case, ruling on Thursday that Alabama district maps that diluted Black votes violated the Voting Rights Act”

Kavanaugh flipped, its as simple as that.

VRA alive and well thanks to the majority of justices.

Allan