WuWei
297
What did dem leadership say they will do about guns?
1 Like
WuWei
298
No need to sniff. They reek.
JayJay
299
There policy is not to “come for your guns”.
You could find this out if you actually read the proposed policies as opposed to blindly accepting the CEC take on those policies.
1 Like
First, no. Second, Paul wasn’t “attacked.” Third, there are “lunatics” on both sides.
1 Like
WuWei
301
Sure seems so. Yes he was.
NJBob
302
Yeah, it is hard to get the smell of horse out of your cloths. 
Nope. Crazy people all around.
Define “attacked” so we can all be on the same page.
WuWei
304
Why on earth would anyone want to?
1 Like
STODR
305
Yelling we are gonna murder you and rape your wife. Throwing stuff at them, pushing cops over in an attempt to get to them. Do you need more? Hell the Chicago mayor ordered police to protect her block for less.
2 Likes
You made a statement. But you did not answer the question. Here’s a reminder for you to dodge again.
So they will not come for my .22 caliber rifle with a high capacity magazine? .
WuWei
307
I believe they mentioned spitting and pushing.
If there’s any politician who needs to be afraid of being murdered, Rand Paul’s it. Folks playing it down & calling him names need to check themselves because at this rate we really will have a congressman or senator who’s killed.
And yes he and his wife most certainly were attacked.
2 Likes
That’s not a definition.
But fine. If someone comes up to a person and says “What goes around comes around. You ■■■■■■■■■■■■■ are gonna pay. Someone’s gonna bomb you. Maybe even tonight.”
Is that an attack?
STODR
310
Followed by trying to get to them and throwing stuff at them it is.
JayJay
311
I did answer your question. With that statement.
That’s how you answer a question.
With a statement.
1 Like
Only lunatics defend lunatics.
So they will not come for my .22 caliber rifle with a high capacity magazine? .
It’s a yes or no. Pick one.
JayJay
314
My apologies for assuming you were capable of logical inference…since the stated policies in the platform are not to “come for” guns, I assumed you were capable of inferring a “no” answer to your question.
I won’t overestimate your ability to make logical inferences again. I promise.

So an “attack” is defined by “trying to get” someone and “throwing stuff?” Those are required for an “attack” to occur?
My apologies for assuming you had an IQ higher than a third grader and the ability to read and reason. I grossly over estimated your intelligence. I will not make that mistake again. I promise.

There. You had your stupid insult and I had mine. Have they changed their minds on this? I have not heard.