"Senate Republicans are also voicing concerns that restricting stock ownership will put the most burden on colleagues with less money and could dissuade otherwise well-qualified candidates from running for office."
What a complete load of crap! None of these people are anything special and any one of us can easily do these so-called jobs!
I’d say just put ALL investments in a blind trust.
Suppose a guy had a million dollars in investments (IRA or otherwise), and then gets elected to Congress. Should he have to sell it all before being sworn in?
Does this apply only to publicly traded stocks? What if he were invested in a private company? What if he owned his own company? Perhaps a string of car dealerships. Would he have to sell them, lest he appear to favor the auto industry?
Just thinking out loud here, and not necessarily posing these questions to Safiel. (I just used your post as a springboard for the questions that this issue raises for me.)
In my aerospace job I had to go to insider trading compliance every other year for 21 years. What congress does… using family and a nod and a wink to pass on trading tips is a well known but illegal activity for industry. It should be for those who write the laws too. It is always worthy of an investigation at the minimum.
Would not a detailed required disclosure address the issue? That’s what’s required in the executive branch for individual stock holdings (Form OGE-450).
So, based entirely on all my unexamined biases, I think it’s very status as a “no brainer” is exactly why it can’t happen. No way it avoids the zero-sum woodchipper.