i like to point out his own stated hypocrisy. its easy and fun for the whole family

LOL. These Trumpers and their demands for proving a negative. Prove the ghost of J. Edgar Hoover isn’t living in your kitchen.

Impeachment was not a failure.

Allan

You’re right. It deflected attention from China’s interference in US politics, and from the spread of the Wuhan virus while China was exporting it to rival economies. From the Sino-Democrat perspective it was not a waste of time.

2 Likes

We know china has been grooming politicians like Feinstein and the farter with embedded spies assisting their political careers, but for some reason China did not use its leverage among big tech, the media and university activists to influence the 2016 election. How gullible do you have to be to assume that?

3 Likes

No, you guys just have no idea how any of this works and this get super upset about things like the basic way elections work in this country and have forever.

Is it? We’ll all observe what happens on the 6th when what he stated on video, is enacted by members of Congress.

Wrong again.

You were upset about poll watchers and lawyers on call, which does more to prevent election fraud than literally any other thing anyone does. It’s bananas, and you can’t explain what you mean because I don’t think you even have an explanation

Yeah, hopefully they’ll overturn the results of a free and fair election so your guy can win. That’s how much you love America.

Is that the best you can do?

1 Like

I want Biden in the WH if he won honestly but I want it thoroughly examined by a trusted authority before that happens.

2 Likes

I put in more effort with that than the people peddling this ridiculous even by the standards of politics stolen election conspiracy. So I’m still working harder than them.

You put effort into making it personal.

I don’t know how to do the copyright symbol on my phone keyboard.

Type ( c )

Take out the spaces. A better course of action would be not to imply members of this forum don’t love their country.

There is no result of a free and fair election until inauguration day. There are interim results that are liable to be challenged on legal grounds using legal statutes. You are whining about an interim result that suits you, potentially being superceded by a different outcome based on the application of legal challenges.

If the interim result stands the legal challenges being made, you’ll get the result you want. If it doesn’t, it wasn’t the correct result anyway.

Yeah, but the election wasn’t close. By a long shot.

Even you get how first past the post works.

When you prevent something from happening you succeed if that is your intent. If you fail, you tried to interfere but failed.

Might want to read your own cited definition again.

Nothing the Russians did, prevented anyone from casting a vote.

Nothing prevented them from casting a vote for their preferred candidate.

There is no evidence at all to indicate anything they did had any effect on the outcome.

So how then do their efforts amount to “interference”?

2 Likes