That’s no different than saying the physics is absolute around things like the greenhouse effect, heating up of the atmosphere, etc. A myriad of natural events can occur that can factor in to the equation, but the physics is absolute.
scientists who perform experiments often have problems they want to solve, but the experiment is not meant to solve the problem.
hey it’s ok the fact that most people dont know/remember the scientific method is in large part why things like “global warming” etc are thought to exist.
a method of procedure that has characterized natural science since the 17th century, consisting in systematic observation, measurement, and experiment, and the formulation, testing, and modification of hypotheses.
It is a true statement that scientists perform experiments on occasion with the goal of solving a problem with those experiments.
It is also a true statement that one goal of scientific experiments is to solve problems in a general sense.
Thank you for thinking that my posts sound ignorant.
I will never have an opinion about your posts.
I consider having an opinion about an anonymous Internet person to be a waste of my time. Just typing these words explaining my view to you took away a few seconds of my life.
But I’m an occasional altruist, so you’re welcome.
The scientific method is all about hypotheses, which is a prediction you create prior to running an experiment. A strong hypotheses consist of three distinct parts: a definition of the problem, a proposed solution, and a result.
The funny thing is carbon emissions registered their smallest decline in four years in Trump’s first year as President and are forecast to rise in 2019 and 2020.