Harris vs Trump Policy Discussion

[WuWei]

@Guilds

Government spending is part of the economy, and can help stimulate the economy.

Hologram.

[WuWei]

He cut taxes on you too.

[WuWei]

Has Harris mentioned anything about cutting taxes? Cutting spending?

I know Trump mentioned taxes on social security.

[gooddad409]

@SixFoot

I suspect the business of deporting criminal immigrants is about to get lucrative, in spite of the winning candidate.

We’re gonna need to give the government more power and money to fix their own ■■■■ up again.

Not if Kamala wins.

More open borders in that case.

The woke libs fully intend to destroy the country.

[WuWei]

Has Harris mentioned anything about stopping the piss away in Ukraine?

[gooddad409]

@mot1man

@DisturbedGuy

The bipartisan bill was a good start until Trump killed it.

How many Rebublicans were in favor of that bill?

ETA… Is that you Kamala? She said the exact same thing. How is that you are using her exact words?

The Senate bill was intended to make it harder for Trump to close the border if he wins.

The house bill Shumer refused to bring to the floor was a much better bill.

I missed all the posts already pointing out the flaws in that senate bill.

Much better worded than mine.

Sorry bout that guys.

[WuWei]

@WuWei

Has Harris mentioned anything about stopping the piss away in Ukraine?

No. It continues

Harris is committed to supporting Ukraine in its fight against Russian aggression, having met with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky at least six times and announcing last month $1.5 billion for energy assistance, humanitarian needs and other aid for the war-torn country.

At the Munich Security Conference earlier this year, Harris said: “I will make clear President Joe Biden and I stand with Ukraine. In partnership with supportive, bipartisan majorities in both houses of the United States Congress, we will work to secure critical weapons and resources that Ukraine so badly needs. And let me be clear: The failure to do so would be a gift to Vladimir Putin.”

What Kamala Harris has said so far on key issues in her campaign

[Striker840]

@WuWei

Cool. Intel is also cutting 15k jobs.

You asked if any chip makers were expanding their production facilities, Intel is. Nothing in your post mentioned job cuts/increases.

[Striker840]

@biggestal99

@Samm

He knows plenty, gut he’s still only factoring in half of the equation … just like you are.

he giving us his informed opinion, you are giving us one that is less informed.

you are a radical partisan layman.

Allan

Let us guess, you are non-partisan…LMAO

[WuWei]

@Striker840

@WuWei

Cool. Intel is also cutting 15k jobs.

You asked if any chip makers were expanding their production facilities, Intel is. Nothing in your post mentioned job cuts/increases.

I understand.

[WuWei]

And apparently a priest.

[WuWei]

What Harris policy is going to benefit me?

[gooddad409]

@Striker840

@biggestal99

@Samm

He knows plenty, gut he’s still only factoring in half of the equation … just like you are.

he giving us his informed opinion, you are giving us one that is less informed.

you are a radical partisan layman.

Allan

Let us guess, you are non-partisan…LMAO

Nonpartisan as Nancy Pelosi.

[DougBH]

@biggestal99

@Eagle-Keeper

Which Trump and the Republicans would have done as well, albeit a more scaled down version.

4 years, never got it done. biden didnt need even a year to get it into law.

a feather in the biden legacy cap.

Allan

Could it be that it was blocked by a Democrat congress?

[DougBH]

@Eagle-Keeper

@biggestal99

@Eagle-Keeper

Which Trump and the Republicans would have done as well, albeit a more scaled down version.

4 years, never got it done. biden didnt need even a year to get it into law.

Very dependent upon the makeup of Congress, Dems held both Houses at the time.

And Pelosi was not going to give Trump a victory even if she had to hurt the country to do it.

[EternalVigilance]

@WuWei

What Harris policy is going to benefit me?

None of them want to discuss policy, because they know it’s a losing proposition.

[DisturbedGuy]

@EternalVigilance

@WuWei

What Harris policy is going to benefit me?

None of them want to discuss policy, because they know it’s a losing proposition.

Or Harris has only been the presumptive nominee for 14 days and they are still hashing out public policy objectives. We’ll see soon enough.

[DougBH]

@DisturbedGuy

Or Harris has only been the presumptive nominee for 14 days and they are still hashing out public policy objectives. We’ll see soon enough.

Right. And she has only been VP in the Biden/Harris administration for three and a half years. No time to think about policies.
No, she is trying to use the hide in the basement policy of Biden. No press conference in those 14 days.

[DisturbedGuy]

@DougBH

@DisturbedGuy

Or Harris has only been the presumptive nominee for 14 days and they are still hashing out public policy objectives. We’ll see soon enough.

Right. And she has only been VP in the Biden/Harris administration for three and a half years. No time to think about policies.
No, she is trying to use the hide in the basement policy of Biden. No press conference in those 14 days.

Nonsense Doug…she has campaign events with whomever is the VP scheduled in 7 battleground states the next 2 weeks.

[WuWei]

@DougBH

@Eagle-Keeper

@biggestal99

@Eagle-Keeper

Which Trump and the Republicans would have done as well, albeit a more scaled down version.

4 years, never got it done. biden didnt need even a year to get it into law.

Very dependent upon the makeup of Congress, Dems held both Houses at the time.

And Pelosi was not going to give Trump a victory even if she had to hurt the country to do it.

Was that the meeting that Pelosi said he needed an intervention? The meeting that never happened?