Nature allows us the ability to fertilize eggs without having sex. Sex is no longer required.

How is that not natural?

Human medical technology is not nature.

Like what? Birds and bees?

Our ability to create that technology…is.

No. That would make the surrogate the mother

No it’s not.

Is homosexuality a medical condition? We should find a cure.

2 Likes

Maybe a blender…

1 Like

What standards do you use to define it?

“Adoptive father”

“Biological male”
“Biological female”

Adjective Party!

1 Like

Do you really intend to argue that using technology to artificially create conditions outside the human body, to replicate a process that occurs naturally within the human body, without any assistance, is natural? If so, this is a prime example of why you can’t be taken seriously.

3 Likes

AKA a unicorn

1 Like

Child rearing and marriage are sacred responsibilities.

No, it only happens between a male and female.

1 Like

I literally said our ability to create the technology is natural.

However being fully natural or not is irrelevant when it comes to surrogacy using your own sperm or egg. If I prove my sperm to someone else… via intercourse or some artificial means… I am still the father of that resulting child…

Intercourse is not required to be a father.

marx nodding yes

Right, hence the reason homosexuals cannot procreate.

Correct, but a homosexual can be a father.

Who the ■■■■ warped your morality?

4 Likes