So just for discussion-sake; If we let you ban “assault-type” guns, will that be the end of it no matter what happens?
I haven’t forgotten that the so-called “Assault Weapons Ban” of 1994 was not limited to “assault-type guns”. You also banned a lot of other ■■■■■ So you’re not trustworthy. No pistol mags or any of that stuff. ARs, AKs, FNs and clones. That’s it.
Yes, we have a deal. Just those
No, all semiautomatics and no mags over 10
No, only police will have guns
No, not only are we taking your guns, your knives and bows are next.
I can’t imagine anyone voting for any of those options unless they hated the existence of firearms just for the sake of hating them.
Can you add an option for taking measured steps to end mass violence to the poll? Bumpstocks aren’t guns, but they were an issue that this poll doesn’t cover.
They can always be unbanned. And since this poll is supposed to be a promise that’s the end of everything no matter what happens, it’s important that there be an option nuanced enough to handle such a situation.
Just bump stocks? That garbage doesn’t deserve its own option. They stayed banned for the purpose of this discussion.
What is it with you libs whining about poll options? And stop saying ■■■■■■■ “nuance”. It doesn’t mean what you want it to. Everything in life is not “nuancy”. In fact most things aren’t. Make a decision.
