Only in the minds of those who place the interests of this DACA group above those waiting on line and abiding by our laws.
Why do you support the subjugation of the rule of law?
JWK
Only in the minds of those who place the interests of this DACA group above those waiting on line and abiding by our laws.
Why do you support the subjugation of the rule of law?
JWK
mobulis: johnwk2: biggestal99:They were young kids following their parents.
Next.
Allan
So? That does not justify allowing them to jump to the front of our immigration line. Let them get on line like everyone else if they want to be part of our country.
JWK
Illegal immigration is now costing American citizens over $18 billion a year in healthcare costs alone, far more than the cost of building a wall! LINK
Yes it does.
Only in the minds of those who place the interests of this DACA group above those waiting on line and abiding by our laws.
Why do you support the subjugation of the rule of law?
JWK
Illegal immigration is now costing American citizens over $18 billion a year in healthcare costs alone! LINK
Sometimes the law is wrong.
johnwk2: mobulis: johnwk2: biggestal99:They were young kids following their parents.
Next.
Allan
So? That does not justify allowing them to jump to the front of our immigration line. Let them get on line like everyone else if they want to be part of our country.
JWK
Illegal immigration is now costing American citizens over $18 billion a year in healthcare costs alone, far more than the cost of building a wall! LINK
Yes it does.
Only in the minds of those who place the interests of this DACA group above those waiting on line and abiding by our laws.
Why do you support the subjugation of the rule of law?
JWK
Illegal immigration is now costing American citizens over $18 billion a year in healthcare costs alone! LINK
Sometimes the law is wrong.
Because you disagree with the law does not make it “wrong”.
JWK
mobulis: johnwk2: mobulis: johnwk2: biggestal99:They were young kids following their parents.
Next.
Allan
So? That does not justify allowing them to jump to the front of our immigration line. Let them get on line like everyone else if they want to be part of our country.
JWK
Illegal immigration is now costing American citizens over $18 billion a year in healthcare costs alone, far more than the cost of building a wall! LINK
Yes it does.
Only in the minds of those who place the interests of this DACA group above those waiting on line and abiding by our laws.
Why do you support the subjugation of the rule of law?
JWK
Illegal immigration is now costing American citizens over $18 billion a year in healthcare costs alone! LINK
Sometimes the law is wrong.
Because you disagree with the law does not make it “wrong”.
JWK
American citizens are sick and tired of being made into tax-slaves to finance the economic needs of millions of poverty stricken, poorly educated, low and unskilled aliens who have invaded America’s borders.
And just because you agree with the law doesn’t make it right.
johnwk2: mobulis: johnwk2: mobulis: johnwk2: biggestal99:They were young kids following their parents.
Next.
Allan
So? That does not justify allowing them to jump to the front of our immigration line. Let them get on line like everyone else if they want to be part of our country.
JWK
Illegal immigration is now costing American citizens over $18 billion a year in healthcare costs alone, far more than the cost of building a wall! LINK
Yes it does.
Only in the minds of those who place the interests of this DACA group above those waiting on line and abiding by our laws.
Why do you support the subjugation of the rule of law?
JWK
Illegal immigration is now costing American citizens over $18 billion a year in healthcare costs alone! LINK
Sometimes the law is wrong.
Because you disagree with the law does not make it “wrong”.
JWK
American citizens are sick and tired of being made into tax-slaves to finance the economic needs of millions of poverty stricken, poorly educated, low and unskilled aliens who have invaded America’s borders.
And just because you agree with the law doesn’t make it right.
And whether or not you like it, it is the law of the land!
JWK
Why is the Democrat Party Leadership determine to ignore and subjugate the rule of law?
JWK
Why is the Democrat Party Leadership determine to ignore and subjugate the rule of law?
JWK
Our federal government is charged with providing "… for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions”.
Its not…
johnwk2:Why is the Democrat Party Leadership determine to ignore and subjugate the rule of law?
JWK
Our federal government is charged with providing "… for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions”.
Its not…
You apparently have not read our Constitution, and in particularly, Article 1, Section 8, Clause 15.
JWK
You apparently have not read our Constitution, and in particularly, Article 1, Section 8, Clause 15
we all know what it says.
we just do interrupt as you do.
simple disagreement among the citizens.
which is why we have courts to determine important federal questions.
Allan
we all know what it says.
we just do interrupt as you do.
simple disagreement among the citizens.
which is why we have courts to determine important federal questions.
Allan
The thing is you, John do not like an opinion you cannot accept it,
whereas I can,
If Roberts rules Obamacare is a tax. Thats just the way it is, until overruled by another SCOTUS court in the future.
Allan
Allan
johnwk2:You apparently have not read our Constitution, and in particularly, Article 1, Section 8, Clause 15
we all know what it says.
And it declares, in crystal clear language: To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;
JWK
And it declares, in crystal clear language: To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;
Is this an invasion. Seems to me there would be disagreement on the very thing.
you think it an invasion. I do not.
simple disagreement among citizens.
Thats why we have the court system.
Allan
You don’t have a clue.
No? 41,000 Guatemalans were granted B Visas.
Allan
johnwk2:And it declares, in crystal clear language: To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;
Is this an invasion. Seems to me there would be disagreement on the very thing.
you think it an invasion. I do not.
OK genius, exactly how do you characterize the following?
JWK
OK genius, exactly how do you characterize the following?
I dont see any weapons.
Invasions most likely have weapons (see the war of 1812 or Pancho Villa)
Allan
Allan
johnwk2:OK genius, exactly how do you characterize the following?
I dont see any weapons.
Invasions most likely have weapons (see the war of 1812 or Pancho Villa)
Allan
Allan
You didn’t answer the question.
The fact is, invasions come in many forms, e.g., see the following:
JWK
altair1013: calirepub:What does this even mean? Are you talking about a wall? Because Democrats are in favor of border security that doesn’t include a wall.
Nope. They used to claim to be. But now, most democrats are in favor of sanctuary cities and open borders. The do not want anyone who has violated our borders to be deported.
Name 5 National Democrats that support actual open borders.
Keith Ellison for starters. There’s one.
The fact is, invasions come in many forms, e.g., see the following:
I would hardly characterize some Guatemalans applying for asylum as an invasion.
But thats just the way I think
you think differently.
Simple disagreement among citizens
Thats what we have courts for.
Allan
johnwk2:The fact is, invasions come in many forms, e.g., see the following:
I would hardly characterize some Guatemalans applying for asylum as an invasion.
But thats just the way I think
you think differently.
Simple disagreement among citizens
Thats what we have courts for.
Allan
Some people are saying they’re Asylum seekers.