If those exist, where are the quotes that qualify as reliable evidence. Are you trying to say that therapy notes that contain neither the name of the abuser nor the place and time, are evidence that a particular person later pointed to was the abuser mentioned in the therapy notes? You set a very low bar, as gullible people do.
If she had have later named you as that person referred to in the therapy notes, would you think her therapy notes were problematic for you, and indicated that people would be reasonable to suspect you to be an abuser?
Must you be so confrontational and insulting all the time? As I have said a couple of times now, it is evidence. The quality of each piece of evidence is weighed. And I have said from the get-go, it does not rise to the level of discerning guilt. But had there been a trial, it would be provided as evidence, right? And the defense would have worked to diminish the evidence.
Cry me a river. I like Trump’s approach. When posters throw a punch, I am entitled to hit back. They shouldn’t run to mommy or ask for exceptional treatment when they can’t handle getting back just what they dish out.
Everyone says things about others’ views or their manner of debate that the one critiqued may take personally. if people can’t handle that, they should either stay in a safe space, or better still, learn to cope with it. Some even make direct personal attacks like “you have zero credibility when it comes to evaluating things objectively.”
It would be nice to see people actually answer posed questions by quoting sources that state what they claim those sources say, and then fielding rebuttals, rather than just seeing people merely reciting the mantra, “You need to read …” and claiming the proof is in there somewhere.
You consider a woman, whose expertise is in psychology and the creation of false memories, reporting to her therapist that someone raped her but not able to recall who, when or where, and then later claiming that that person was definitely Kavanaugh, at an event none of the people she named as being present recalled being at - you consider that evidence that Kavanaugh may well have raped her?
