Government Lawyers embrace and salivate over Equality Act, unconstitutional protected class legislation

John. I don’t think the brother reads anything but liberal talking points.

Not really that is an example. If there is an non availability of opposite sex partners some will experiment with gay sex. Nothing extreme. Mankind has some pleasure issues.

What I mean is that is not straights becoming gay. If given the choice, they go back to straightness. With some psychological issues I suspect, given how bigoted much of society is and would consider them less of a man for it.

Come in Man, this makes no sense. Sounds like someone trying ride a bicycle BACKWARDS.

Did they turn gay? No. They satisfied their animal instincts and remained straight when freed from prison. I don’t see why it wouldn’t be the same for people who are by nature gay. It’s just who they are.

Maybe there is no such thing as gayness after reading what you are saying. If you cannot be with the one you love, love the one you are with. Sounds like an old song.

The Equality Act is about normalizing sexual behavior, expressions and proclivities!

It sure seems that way or FloridaYankee actually agrees with and supports using government force [the Equality Act] to compel the public at large to endure and provide a safe space for those who publicly display sexual behavior, expressions and proclivities which are offensive to some.

The ringleaders behind the Equality Act are very clever in presenting the Act as legitimate federal legislation similar to that adopted to end distinctions in law based upon race. But unlike the Civil Rights Act of 1875 ___ intended to assert an equal treatment of all men before the law ___ the Equality Act is not about asserting equal treatment among mankind before the law. The Act is a bold attempt to normalize sexual behavior expressions and proclivities and forbid the public at large to make distinctions in their daily social, religious and commercial activities to avoid sexual deviant behavior, expressions and proclivities which are found to be offensive by some, and participated in and enjoyed by others.

The absurd and obnoxious idea is to elevate and classify sexual deviant behavior, expressions and proclivities as a “federally protected” subject matter, and forbidding the States and public at large to make distinctions in their daily lives based upon sexual deviant behavior, expressions and proclivities, found to be offensive.

JWK

If the Equality Act, should ever become a federal “rule of law”, it would not only subvert the human right of the majority of American citizens to be free to mutually agree in their social, religious and commercial activities ___ it would allow federal bureaucrats to dictate almost every aspect of the American peoples’ social and commercial activities.

+10 :+1:

While the force of government may properly be used to allow specific sexual behaviors, expressions and proclivities, and prohibit criminal prosecutions for such activities, it is not the role of government in a freedom loving society to compel the public at large to accept and endure the personal behaviors, expressions and proclivities of any person.

But this is exactly what the Equality Act is about . . . cramming down the throats of the public at large the personal sexual behaviors, expressions and proclivities of some to the detriment of others, and thereby creating a privileged class with the muscle of government to force total submission and acceptance of sexual activities which may be found offensive and obnoxious to some, religiously or otherwise. .

JWK

2 Likes

I wonder how many women actually realize the threat which the Equality Act is to them.

See Biden’s Equality Act is a danger to women’s and conscience rights

Here’s the text: “An individual shall not be denied access to a shared facility, including a restroom, a locker room and a dressing room, that is in accordance with the individual’s gender identity.” So you can keep separate facilities for men and women, but you have to redefine what men and women are. Likewise, you can ­reserve certain jobs only for men or women — think TSA agents doing pat-downs — but you have to let a man who identifies as a woman do strip searches on women."

.

But the ending of women’s safe spaces where men are simply not welcome, e.g., bathrooms, women’s shelters, women’s only colleges and mid-schools, etc., and opening the door to males preforming strip searches on women, is but a part of the threat which the Democrat Party Leadership’s Equality Act is about. The Democrat Leadership’s plan would erase legislation found under Title IX as applied to education which benefits women, in addition to ending women’s only sports…

As I have mentioned elsewhere, the Democrat Party Leadership once stood up for the average working family in America. Today, it is more than obvious the democrat party leadership is becoming the American family’s worst nightmare.

JWK

The Equality Act attempts to exercise legislative power proposed under the “Equal Rights Amendment” which was wisely rejected by the American people, and thus, to this degree, the Act is an attempted usurpation of legislative power not granted.

Is the reported support for the Equality Act crumbling before our eyes?

See: What America really thinks of the Equality Act

July 15th, 2021

"In March, Gallup reported on Americans viewing LGBTQ civil rights more favorably. Another survey conducted by Hart Research for the Human Rights Campaign, an LGBTQ advocacy group, indicated 70% of Americans support the Equality Act. And, finally, a Public Religion Research Institute survey found 82% of Americans approve of “laws that would protect gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender people against discrimination in jobs, public accommodations and housing.”

But a recent national survey organized by Big Ocean Women, United Families International, of which I’m a board member, and feminist thinker Natasha Chart now calls into question the meaning of that widespread support."

The article goes on to point out “… there is a sizable disparity between the public’s endorsement for the perceived benefits of the Equality Act and its actual outcomes for women, girls and religious adherents should the act become law.” Of course, the public’s support for the Act is directly traceable to the love affair our mainstream media has with promoting the Act, and its failure to report the devastating consequences of the Act for women, girls and religious adherents should it become the nation’s “rule of law”.

JWK

The Equality Act attempts to exercise legislative power proposed under the “Equal Rights Amendment” which was wisely rejected by the American people, and thus, to this degree, the Act is an attempted usurpation of legislative power not granted.

Fair polling questions confirm dwindling support for Equality Act

.
See Poll: Voters Hate The Equality Act When They Hear What It Actually Does

JUNE 24, 2021

”While a majority of voters like the sound of the Equality Act, the same voters overwhelmingly oppose its provisions when they find out what it would do, according to a new national survey of 3,000 likely voters by United Families International and Big Ocean Women. The survey, which boasts a margin of error of less than 2 percent, was weighted to match the demographics of the 2020 presidential electorate and focused on women’s privacy and safety.”

It’s absolutely amazing to learn when poll questions are finally asked reflecting the devastating consequences which the Equality Act would have upon women and girls, support for the Act falls like a rock!

JWK

See The Equality Act would lead to the death of women’s rights

Surely women have a right to private sleeping quarters in a women’s shelter. But not according to Anchorage’s non-discrimination policy, nor according to the Equality Act.

The article goes on to point out the Equality Act “. . . threatens women’s sports, shelters and schools, silencing female athletes, domestic abuse survivors, mothers, teachers, physicians.”

The ringleaders behind the Equality Act have been very clever at presenting the Act as necessary federal legislation similar to that adopted to end distinctions in law based upon race. But unlike the Civil Rights Act of 1875 ___ intended to establish equal treatment of all men before the law ___ the Equality Act is not about asserting equal treatment among mankind before the law. The Act is a bold attempt to forbid the public at large to make distinctions in their daily social, religious and commercial activities to avoid sexual deviant behavior, expressions and proclivities which are found to be offensive by some, and participated in and enjoyed by others.

The absurd and obnoxious idea is to elevate and classify sexual deviant behavior, expressions and proclivities into a “federally protected class”, and use the muscle of our federal government to forbid the States and public at large to make distinctions and choices in their daily lives to avoid sexual deviant behavior, expressions and proclivities, found to be offensive and/or immoral.

There is no “live and let live” and “freedom of choice” thinking in the Equality Act. It is designed to compel total submission to sexual deviant behavior, expressions and proclivities, regardless of how offensive they may be, religiously or otherwise. And that is sickening.

JWK

The Equality Act attempts to exercise legislative power proposed under the “Equal Rights Amendment” which was wisely rejected by the American people, and thus, to this degree, the Act is an attempted usurpation of legislative power not granted.

Backers of the Equality Act promise it does not threaten women’s rights, but …

With regard to female athletes, they are already suffering from the insane thinking which the Equality Act would make a “federal rule of law”.

See: Judge sides with trans athletes against girls who just want fairness

"Trans activists and their allies like Judge Chatigny are determined that trans persons won’t feel bad. That’s admirable. But “not feeling bad” isn’t a right guaranteed under law. Fairness and equality, ideals that are enshrined in law, should bar athletes with male bodies from competing against those with female bodies.

The whole edifice of American antidiscrimination law, including Title IX, rests on there being a meaningful bodily distinction between the two sexes. Remove that foundation — and the justice of antidiscrimination law crumbles."

The absurd, irrational and obnoxious thinking behind the “Equality Act” is to use man-made law in a perverted manner to overrule what nature has created . . . Adam and Eve.

JWK

The Equality Act attempts to exercise legislative power proposed under the “Equal Rights Amendment” which was wisely rejected by the American people, and thus, to this degree, the Act is an attempted usurpation of legislative power not granted.