That’s a pretty big leap there my friend. How does supporting our Constitution embrace “government sanctioned bigotry and discrimination”, and especially when that very constitution allows for change via its amendment process?
JWK
Our socialist/fascist revolutionaries, which now control the Democrat Party Leadership, are known for accusing others of what they themselves are guilty of.
Freedom of association <> Freedom to exclude
If it did there would be an exclusion clause along with the association clause.
I have no idea what your comment has to do with Gorsuch condoning a usurpation of power by using the Humpty Dumpty Theory of Language, and applying it to our Constitution.
"When I use a word," Humpty Dumpty said, in rather a scornful tone, "it means just what I choose it to mean- neither more nor less."
JWK
The Democrat Party’s Revolutionary Leadership, detests people being left free to mutually agree in their contracts and associations.
I have no idea that your lame assertion actually happened. I do know that your earlier assertion “discrimination is merely freedom of choice” is also wrong, so I’ll just go with you being consistent on this one.
Well, I can see you have a desire to personalize the thread rather than respond to the fact that Justice Gorsuch gave his thumb up to a usurpation of power by using the Humpty Dumpty Theory of Language, and applying it to our Constitution.
"When I use a word," Humpty Dumpty said, in rather a scornful tone, "it means just what I choose it to mean- neither more nor less."
JWK
The Democrat Party’s Revolutionary Leadership, detests people being left free to mutually agree in their contracts and associations.
So, if an Oriental man refuses to marry a Hispanic female, that is “wrong”?
Why do so many detest people being free to mutually agree in their contracts and associations?
JWK
The Democrat Party’s socialist/fascist Revolutionary Leadership detests people being left free to mutually agree in their contracts and associations.
The Equality Act attempts to exercise legislative authority proposed under the “Equal Rights Amendment” which was rejected by the American people, and thus, to this degree, the Equality Act, is a usurpation of power not granted.
The proposed Equal Rights Amendment to the Constitution is as follows:
"ARTICLE —
"Section 1. Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.
"Sec. 2. The Congress shall have the power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.
“Sec. 3. This amendment shall take effect two years after the date of ratification.”
Note that Section 2 would grant the power which Gorsuch exercised in spite of the American People denying that power to our federal government, and to this degree, Gorsuch acted as judge, jury and executioner . . . so to speak.
JWK
”The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands [our Supreme Court] . . . may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny.” ___ Madison, Federalist Paper No. 47
