That is disingenuous to say the least. You are comparing the first year of Trump, which is actually the remainder of Obamas term, as full credit to Trump. Okay, you know the equivalence of 2017 is 2009. The first year of Trump 2017 was 2.2 gdp growth. 2009 was the first year of Obama -2.2 gdp, horribly lousy. So the equivalent is a Trump growth of 2.2 compared to -2.2 of Obama, Trump up 4.4. Now, if you say, well, that is all Bush’s fault in 2009, that Obama’s first year was minus 2.2, forget those numbers, then it is faulty to make that comparison. then that 2.2 growth is all Obama, not Trump. If it is Trumps first year of 2.2 of 2017 then you blame Obama for the -2.2 of 2009. Bad Obama. Still .6 better than Obama’s 1.6. If -2.2 of 2009 is all Bush’s fault and you must put 2017 as Obama’s last year, then fine, you must put the low 2.2 number in 2017 as Obama’s last year. Either way, Trumps numbers are better than Obama. If you count 2016 as Obama’s last year, then Trump jumped it from Obama 1.6 Obama 2016 to Trump 2017 2.2. Trump up by .6. and it went up to 2.9. Advantage Trump. If you put 2017 as Obama’s last year of 2.2 (and only then can you say he wasn’t at fault for the 2009 gdp -2.2, the first year is a .7 growth from 2.2 to 2.9. So Obama 2014 2.5, 2015, 2.9, 2016, 1.6 and 2017, 2.2 Obama. Trump first year 2018, 2.9 = equals Obama’s best, better than 7 out of 8 Obama years if you frame it either way, from 2009 to 2016, or 2010 to 2017. And either way, Trump exceeds Obama’s GDP growth. Of course after 8 years, 2016 was 1.6 or 2.2 in 2017, which was Obama in full force.