Do you ever believe numbers (or anything) coming from the deep state… AKA The Bureau of Economic Analysis?

There is nothing mathematically wrong with “that bit.”

What ever was 3%.

What does the Good Lord have to do with this?

overall, yes. compared to the “basket off goods”. That does not however take into effect increased prices in specific sectors, like health care. The increased sending on health care is not due to people getting more of it, its due to them paying more for it (mostly). And healthcare spending was the #1 driving force behind the increase.

Try writing it down. Maintaining a consistent meaning of q3 GDP growth, q4 growth, and “it”. Your math makes a switcheroo and is logically inconsistent.

Maybe you should do the same. In the 3rd quarter the growth rate was 4.9%. In the 4th quarter the growth rate was 3.%. From 3rd quarter to 4th quarter, the growth was not “up,” it was “down.”

1 Like

Wow you are bored.

1 Like

Where does “growth rate” come from. “It” is GDP. The switcheroo.

For reference:

Wow you are blasphemous, even for a non-believer.

Go back to pretending you’re a mod. And stay on topic. :wink:

Stop blaspheming

Stop getting triggered.

1 Like

Can’t do it, not about that. Since you’re a non-believer, He’s not yours to invoke. Get His name out your mouth.

That is correct. The growth rate of 3.3% is 33.65% less than the growth rate of 4.9%.

But if others are triggered by things you want them to stop being snowflakes/critprogs/hypocrites/Karen’s…suck it up buttercup. Be a man.

2 Likes

And for the record…I love Jesus. You don’t get to tell me anything. And you sure as hell can’t tell me what I can or can’t say. Jesus.

No “That” is not correct. Because that is not what you said. You said:

Now you are revising the terminology . Correcting what was not correct.

I am not. All I did there was to clarify the terminology. The math is unchanged.

“GDP” to “GDP growth rate” is not a clarification it is an alteration.

And +3.3% refers to the former.