My thoughts are that since most objects that pass us come from outside they pass us outside. Rarely do they pass between us and the sun and usually arent’ even detected until they have passed us by.
They have the ability to be accurate within whatever level of accuracy existed at the time.
Of course it’s only in the modern era that we have the ability to get meter resolution but even then that requires we are monitoring from far enough away to actually measure the distance.
No kidding. 
Which is exactly why bringing up observations from ancient civilizations (still waiting to hear more about those observations 75,000 years ago, whenever it’s convenient for you) is irrelevant. Especially since you have no idea what their margin of error is (as you admitted).
One more time, the historical data can’t confirm something they don’t have the accuracy to detect.
You’ve already gotten the same answer multiple times. what is it you expect that will be changing?
Don’t know. Maybe the next time the “answer” will actually address my criticism. So far it hasn’t. You just keep inventing new unsupportable claims to cover for the unsupportable claims you made up earlier.
(And maybe we can get more information on the observations from 75,000 years ago, who knows, I’m feeling lucky today).
I haven’t invented anything new, quit making baseless fraudulent claims.
Sure you did. The idea that the orbit somehow corrects is baseless and made up as has been shown throughout the thread.
I think you also made up the idea that we have historical records on our orbit from 75,000 years ago but I really don’t expect you to address that claim since it just seems so far fetched.
I’d love to hear more about this culture from 75k years ago. Middle Paleolithic cultures and astronomy? I’m fascinated!
I love it when your “evidence” of something is that you said it multiple times.
Again … I’m not talking about something that happened 4 billion years ago, I’m talking about something that didn’t happen 4 billion years ago; a near miss by a mass large enough to tug Earth off its orbit. If you would read what I say instead of making up your own narrative, we wouldn’t get into these discussions stractions. Comprende?
I’m still trying to figure out why you think something that did (or didn’t) happen 4 billion years ago is relevant.
There are far more variables than that. Mass of the object; velocity of the object; distance from Earth as it passes; and the direction it is moving with respect to the orbit (there are more than than two directions possible) of Earth. When all the variables are considered, the chance that their effect would be canceled out is probably very small.
The more objects there are, the more likely they are to have a net zero effect.
I thought we were in agreement … there are relatively few large mass objects roaming about the Galaxy that could affect our orbit. Have you changed your position?
Depends on whether you’re talking about affecting it in any significant way.
That depends on what you call significant.
You overlooked my earlier question in your zeal to criticize me … don’t you think that if an object as massive as the one that created the Moon, if it came close but did not collide, would be sufficient to alter Earth’s orbit “significantly”?
I thought it was a rhetorical question because the answer is obvious and in many ways I’ve answered it ad nauseum.
Ever find any information on those 75k year astronomical observations?
What information is it exactly you think is available? What we know is that the alignments are still as accurate today as they were then. The megaliths have not moved, the apertures have not moved, and the same constellations, the sun, and moon still appear in the same manner as they have since the ancient observatories, temples, and pyramids were built.
I’m looking for a name or location of one of these ancient observatories, temples or pyramids that dates to 75,000 years ago.
