Gina Haspel sought to withdraw nomination

bluedogdem · 2018-05-07T13:18:03.642Z

conan:

No way Misogynist party like the democrats will support her…being the first gurl to run the CIA.

yeah that is exactly what it is… the misogynist party wanted to keep a woman down… wait didnt they want a woman as president though?

NebraskaFootball · 2018-05-07T13:19:12.342Z

conan:

No way Misogynist party like the democrats will support her…being the first gurl to run the CIA.

That’s a pretty weak troll attempt. Even for you lib.

Forcefield · 2018-05-07T13:19:49.866Z

Hahaha so ■■■■■■■ weak.

conan · 2018-05-07T13:22:05.997Z

No, the democrats wanted a crook for president.

bluedogdem · 2018-05-07T13:23:56.816Z

To be fair Conan got his marching orders from this tweet

twitter.com

Kayleigh McEnany 45 Archived

@PressSec45

There is no one more qualified to be the first woman to lead the CIA than 30+ year CIA veteran Gina Haspel. Any Democrat who claims to support women’s empowerment and our national security but opposes her nomination is a total hypocrite

8:19 PM - 5 May 2018 30K 7.8K

conan · 2018-05-07T13:26:18.583Z

Just like you posting this thread.

What did Pelosi paid you?

bluedogdem · 2018-05-07T13:29:48.719Z

what are you babbling about? you said the exact same thing Huckabee-Sanders said…

Blackwolf · 2018-05-07T13:31:57.906Z

You libs need lessons in proper trolling.

Airyaman · 2018-05-07T13:38:35.703Z

CNN? Fake news.

johnrandolph · 2018-05-07T13:43:16.370Z

Not buying it. No way anyone so invested in evil does not lust after leading the CIA

Godinez · 2018-05-07T13:54:36.272Z

The same party that nominated Geraldine Ferraro for VP in '84, and Hillary for president in '16? We can disagree with Dems all we want, but the misogynistic argument doesn’t hold water.

Is their opposition to Haspel partisan and petty? Absolutely.

bluedogdem · 2018-05-07T14:01:51.488Z

Godinez:

The same party that nominated Geraldine Ferraro for VP in '84, and Hillary for president in '16? We can disagree with Dems all we want, but the misogynistic argument doesn’t hold water.

Is their opposition to Haspel partisan and petty? Absolutely.

how is it partisan and petty? she ran a torture site… come on man

Godinez · 2018-05-07T14:08:23.918Z

If she was breaking the law at the time, then she should not be considered for the post. If that wasn’t the case, at least she deserves to go through the process.

conan · 2018-05-07T14:11:01.400Z

But yet that didn’t stop libs from supporting their Queen with her law breaking now did it?

party-free · 2018-05-07T14:16:53.074Z

conan:

No way Misogynist party like the democrats will support her…being the first gurl to run the CIA.

So you’re saying the lib queens are Maxine Waters, Pelosi, and Hillary, but they’re “misogynist party.”

Stop trolling, lib.

Plasmaball · 2018-05-07T14:23:49.879Z

So you went with the stupid angle…good for you

conan · 2018-05-07T14:28:52.715Z

Oh stop your crying lib.

You guys are aware that your beloved John Brennan called em patriots.

party-free · 2018-05-07T15:18:17.384Z

conan:

But yet that didn’t stop libs from supporting their Queen with her law breaking now did it?

How can libs be misogynist and worship all their queens like Maxine, Nancy, “Pocahontas” and Hillary, lib? How is that possible, lib?

conan · 2018-05-07T15:19:50.121Z

Because they’re hypocrites.

party-free · 2018-05-07T15:22:30.082Z

conan:

Because they’re hypocrites.

Nice try, lib. Your point fails, so you just accuse them of being a hypocrite, lib.

You honestly looks like a fish doing all this flopping around, lib.