“prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism by an individual, community, or institution against a person or people on the basis of their membership in a particular racial or ethnic group, typically one that is a minority or marginalized.”
Antagonist
“a person who actively opposes or is hostile to someone or something; an adversary.”
Antagonism
"active hostility or opposition.
“the antagonism between them”
Does that mean that when you call libs the actual racists that you’re not actually being serious?
I do love how when @PurpnGold provided the same search of your posts, your arguments pivoted from “look at all these posts about racism from you” to “at least I have fewer counts”.
How in God’s name do think that made you correct? And why do you have this constant need to feel that way? Geez man…
No. You conveniently sort of ignored that part above.
Another version from your Goggle results is: the belief that different races possess distinct characteristics, abilities, or qualities, especially so as to distinguish them as inferior or superior to one another.
Merriam-Webster offers the following: : a belief that race is a fundamental determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race
The point is, the “prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism” must be born out of the belief that the racists’ own race is somehow superior to the other. If you are of the same race, that makes it a bit difficult. That doesn’t mean that “prejudice, discrimination or antagonism” can’t exist, they certainly can, but when among the same race it wouldn’t qualify as racist.
When I was in the army, lighter-skinned blacks made fun of the darker ones as well. That has to be racist because varying other races are involved with skin color.