And in some parts of the country, once registered, one can vote long after they die. :wink:

1 Like

Everything is suppression to the left including cleaning out dead people off voter rows.

2 Likes

Nonsense

It’s not nonsense your party fights it in courts

Nonsense X2

Stacey Abrams Georgia voting law!

My wife is a teacher. Her registration, required to teach in schools, lapses after 5 years unless she takes the initiative to re-register before the deadline. Is this teacher suppression? And if she were colored, would it be automatically racist?

1 Like

Again, the suppression isn’t the automatic de-registration, that just makes it a negative right.

The suppression comes if and when obstacles are set to re-registration. Which is to say the purging in and of itself is not suppression.

What obstacles are being set to re-registration, SWP?

We have yet to see.

The one I am watching for is the I.D. requirement (which I am fine with, BTW) with a subsequent closure of D.M.V. offices (in minority- majority areas) and a concurrent restriction of hours of operation (which will disproportionately affect lower wage workers) both of which tend to vote Democratic.

Another one will be a defunding and de-staffing of clerk offices to frustrate voters wishing to check their voting status. We may also see chicanery with the website: a new website that will be advertised as better, but will actually be worse.

All of this makes voting a negative right, and discourage folks from trying.

However, I also anticipate that Fair Fight Action will be very active in their efforts on registration/re-registration to offset this. If I see all of this, everybody else does as well. This may then require a different strategy that I don’t forsee.

So as I say, we will have to see.

It can be checked on line

Voting is a negative right.

I don’t think it should be. If we made registration automatic, we could do away with all of these fights.

I have no problem with “automatic” registration, depending on how it’s done. They won’t change voting into a positive right.

Sneaky is right…,by definition, voting is a negative right.

Loosely speaking, negative rights are rights government is prohibited from infringing on.

Positive rights are when someone is obligated to act on you in some way regarding your right.

Me being prohibited from killing you is a negative right to life.
Me being obligated to save your life by all means necessary if you are in danger of losing it is a positive right to life.

As long as citizenship is verified.

And how.

Negative rights are where you opt in, positive rights are where you opt out.

I am thinking with driver’s liscences.

And residency?
But we now have two assertions that have to be made by the voter. That doesn’t seem particularly onerous to me. Oh, they would have to verify their age and I suppose that there was nothing that would make them ineligible to vote.
But without going through all these posts, what’s the problem. Did anyone here have a hard time registering and voting. If any of those 100,000 the thread title says were cut, are they not being allowed to re register? They definitely should be allowed to re register and vote, in my opinion. It is terrible if they are removed and not allowed to do that. Is that the issue? It must be.

1 Like