George Soros funding campaigns of candidates who will promote law-breaking

Plasmaball · 2019-11-06T17:51:02.924Z

Gaslighting

Paul_Thomson · 2019-11-06T17:53:07.440Z

Zodiac:

Fake title, fake news. Promoting law breaking and reducing the over prosecution of poor and minority groups are not the same thing.

“Reducing the over prosecution of poor and minority groups” for doing what?

Zodiac · 2019-11-06T17:53:53.465Z

I think this thread should be merged with a hub thread for fake news

Zodiac · 2019-11-06T17:56:30.885Z

Doing things more affluent people get lesser sentences for and highly affluent people get away scott free

Also, you are still unable to show where the candidate is promoting lawbreaking so I am out. Enjoy promoting fake news.

Paul_Thomson · 2019-11-06T17:59:46.566Z

Zodiac:

Doing things more affluent people get lesser sentences for and highly affluent people get away scott free

What do people get sentences for doing?

Yossarian · 2019-11-06T18:11:25.334Z

Paul_Thomson:

enki:

Where’s the promotion of law-breaking?

We see it being played out in other Democrat run cities where theft under 900 dollars will not be prosecuted. And it’s OK to jump turn-stiles on the subway.

Link?
Thanks in advance.

Paul_Thomson · 2019-11-06T18:13:22.445Z

Electing progressive state prosecutors who will not prosecute crimes will create lawless districts away from which conservatives will move, yielding the political appointments in those areas to Democrats, who will be voted for by criminals who want immunity and the majority of the poor programmed to expect handouts who will be vote farmed by the Democrats.

It’s not going to be as quick a strategy for the destruction of the American experiment as winning the presidency, but will be eventually effective, if not countered effectively now. It’s the fall-nack position for when impeachment fails and they lose the House as well in 2020.

Paul_Thomson · 2019-11-06T18:18:44.759Z

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/2016/05/14/shoplifting-california-prop-47-reduced-penalties/amp/&ved=2ahUKEwjsjqfbmNblAhULRo8KHWNRAi0QFjAAegQIAxAB&usg=AOvVaw3968xR2YSDdEvR2mD07A0J&ampcf=1

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://nypost.com/2018/11/21/new-policy-for-turnstile-jumpers-hurting-mtas-bottom-line/amp/&ved=2ahUKEwi8zb6MmdblAhWKKo8KHQKUCTAQFjACegQIDRAO&usg=AOvVaw071A-HMJYMNdk-VVrz9prs&ampcf=1

LucyLou · 2019-11-06T18:22:33.238Z

Nobody wants to click on those nonsense links. Who knows where they go. Tell us in your own words.

FreeAndClear · 2019-11-06T18:34:44.059Z

They still receive a violation and a fine. They didn’t decriminalize it, they just made it into a violation and enforcement of that violation is at sky high levels

TommyLucchese · 2019-11-06T18:37:28.545Z

Paul_Thomson:

Electing progressive state prosecutors who will not prosecute crimes will create lawless districts away from which conservatives will move, yielding the political appointments in those areas to Democrats, who will be voted for by criminals who want immunity and the majority of the poor programmed to expect handouts who will be vote farmed by the Democrats.

If you experienced the level and type of policing the average ghetto does in your neighborhood for one single day, you’d be ready for an armed insurrection.

Borgia_dude · 2019-11-06T19:13:23.797Z

FreeAndClear:

They still receive a violation and a fine. They didn’t decriminalize it, they just made it into a violation and enforcement of that violation is at sky high levels

So those things are still against the law. How did the OP miss that?

Yossarian · 2019-11-06T20:49:55.841Z

FreeAndClear:

They still receive a violation and a fine. They didn’t decriminalize it, they just made it into a violation and enforcement of that violation is at sky high levels

I guess it would be better to clog the courts prosecuting petty thieves and fare dodgers

Paul_Thomson · 2019-11-07T05:45:10.282Z

Yossarian:

I guess it would be better to clog the courts prosecuting petty thieves and fare dodgers

Better to put rich criminals through the courts
as well. The cure for lawlessness is not excusing the crimes of more sectors, but enforcing the law on more sectors.

Paul_Thomson · 2019-11-07T05:46:29.303Z

LucyLou:

Nobody wants to click on those nonsense links. Who knows where they go. Tell us in your own words.

I presume Yosarian does, since he asked for them.

wiley8425 · 2019-11-07T08:40:33.158Z

You have to pay taxes to support police to enforce the laws and judges to try those cases. So that’s out. Can’t have it both ways.

Your whining about enforcing these trivial infractions reminds me of a neighbor who was recently complaining about someone “stealing” cans and bottles off his property and wanting to get the police involved over less than seven dollars worth of said cans and bottles. Never mind that the neighbor had these cans and bottles sitting on top of his garbage can, on the street, instead of behind a locked gate or garage door that the “thief” would have had to actually break into. Needless to say the police didn’t bother responding. As a taxpayer, I would have been pissed if they had.

Paul_Thomson · 2019-11-07T08:48:40.277Z

wiley8425:

As a taxpayer, I would have been pissed

"As a Democrat taxpayer… " Of course, you would.

wiley8425 · 2019-11-07T08:51:21.952Z

I don’t subscribe to either mainstream political party. There are enough sheep as it is. If I vote, I vote based on issues. Honestly not seeing the point these days as every single politician lies in order to get elected anyway. But rah rah, go team there, champ.

wiley8425 · 2019-11-07T08:54:53.382Z

Don’t start looking for consistency now.

FreeAndClear · 2019-11-07T12:02:49.599Z

Paul_Thomson:

wiley8425:

As a taxpayer, I would have been pissed

"As a Democrat taxpayer… " Of course, you would.

Wiley… a Democrat… now i have read everything.