There is no there there. There really isn’t.
Jezcoe
719
Really? So they were going after his son for nothing?
That is something else that could have been included in a statement under oath when he failed to say that his guilty plea was under duress.
Or did he lie about it not being under duress?
1 Like
An op-ed with a bunch of innuendo and “likely” this and “possibly” that is not evidence. What evidence do you have?
What crime did Flynn Jr. commit, specifically?
Since I personally wasn’t involved in Flynn’s case, I have nothing to offer but news articles. It doesn’t surprise me that you would only accept news like-minded articles supporting your position.
So I guess we are done.
This is a deflection. It is noted and discarded.
When you have something more than some random persons unsubstantiated opinion from over 2 years ago to offer, let us know and we can discuss.
They went after Flynn for nothing, so yes they did go after his son as well.
According to you on the left, Trump and everyone associated with him, are nothing but lying machines. Soooooooooo.
I guess that’s all you’ve got.
Not even remotely possible. We live on two very different planets.
Wait, it is not possible for you to…
Well, okay then. You said it.
Jezcoe
726
Knowing that Flynn had the opportunity to say that he was pleading guilty under duress and didn’t take it shows that there is some serious backfilling of an excuse happening here.
1 Like
No excuses. I honestly don’t care. I’m simply providing my opinion, just as you are. 
Jezcoe
728
Yeah. But the opinion you are using leaves out a huge key fact… like the part where Flynn got to say that his plea was being made under duress.
If his story is that he was pressured into pleading guilty then why would he stay quiet when about it when it mattered the most?
You see why that story falls apart… right?
1 Like
Would Flynn’s guilty plea make him entitled to discovery?
Only in your eyes based on your persistent argument regarding duress. I’ve already offered my opinion which is at odds with yours. That doesn’t mean your argument wins the day. Geeze! 
Try reading the court documents. The vast majority are publicly available. Or you could just repeat the headlines you see up to you.
Kind of like “just read the Mueller report” and I too will see the light. 
If you read the Mueller report you wouldn’t keep saying the report said their was no collusion. So yes.
There was no collusion, but then again we don’t need to rehash that water under the bridge.
1 Like
One assumes he will now be scamming for tv interviews now. Who would want to have a felon on tv
Good. Not surprising either.
