I am sure a lot of married people like Trump, so there you go.
zantax
169
Other people’s marriages is none of my business. If Melania doesn’t like his behavior, she knows where the door is.
Oryx
170
Republicans have really evolved on this issue since the Bill Clinton days. Convenient.
zantax
171
I didn’t care about his marriage either. Perjury isn’t marriage.
There was never any doubt that some people support Trump irrespective of what his behaviour is.
Oryx
173
Republicans love to repeat this line, but asking him about his marriage under oath is what led to perjury. You didn’t care, but apparently the people you voted for did, so it’s a distinction without meaning.
1 Like
Guvnah
174
Those are not defensible.
Jezcoe
175
Yet… we have people here… not you per se… but people who do defend it.
I think that that is a problem.
Guvnah
177
Call them on it when it happens.
Jezcoe
178
I have been.
That is why I made the distinction earlier.
You really want to go down this road?
Ginned up in the fact he paid someone off right before the election in order to lie to you about his affairs.
Let’s all ignore those facts
He should have stayed the two black face wearers and the elected official with two rape allegations didn’t step down in Virginia. A lot of people want people to take one for the team as long as they’re not the martyr.
Voting for one amoral person over another amoral person is not “defending”, endorsing, excusing or condoning their behavior. It’s not as if the two candidates were Jesus and Satan here…
What is it about voting for policies and ideas rather than morality you guys don’t get? You seriously are not implying Hillary Clinton is a moral person are you??
We didn’t vote for Barack Obama because of the color of his skin…
We didn’t vote for Hillary Clinton because she is a woman…
Gosh, I wonder what these two people might have in common that would compel people not to vote for them?? 

Chris
184
Why is this even a big deal??? The Democrats currently still have this Senate seat.
Jezcoe
185
I am not implying that Clinton was a moral person in the least bit.
If however a fictional Clinton administration had within it a Secretary of Transportation that was specially handling funding for projects that for her husband that happened to be the Majority leader in the Senate…
There is no way I would excuse it.
Or… for another example… let us say that in a fictional Clinton Administration, the Secretary of Commerce had hidden financial ties to a Russian shipping interest…
There is no way I would excuse it.
Or… for another example… let us say that in ta fictional Clinton Administration, the husband to Chelsea Clinton is for some reason a White House Advisor but cannot get security clearance and ends up getting a clearance and secret documents anyway…
There is no way I would excuse it…
Etc…
Etc…
Etc…
1 Like