FoxNews Breathlessly Pushes Crazy Moon Narrative

[Jezcoe]

@MrOldTimer3.0

Unless you inhabit a cave…(and that is quite possible) you know that Fox has been remorselessly bashing Hollystrange for its spacey portrayal in the movie, First Person On the Moon

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
The movie, First Person On the Moon was produced by BMC and will be in theatres soon. BMC, by the way, is short for Bad Movie Company, a venerable and well respected collection of top Hollystrangers which has been around as long as there have been movies. They take a great book or historic United Nations project and rewrite the ending so as to screw it up.

As we have been taught in school, the first trip to the moon was sponsored by the United Nations. The movie omits this. Further, while they introduce the faux concept of scantily clad rock creatures on the moon which sort of ruins the whole thing, the movie overall is saved by a flyby of the Star Trek Enterprise in a back in time mission to study the first person on the moon landing.

For all of you out there who have not received a review trailer of the movie First Person On the Moon be advised that the actual movie debuts in your local theatre soon. It is said that box office records have already been pre-smashed.

Ingraham: Neil Armstrong Movie 'Trashing Patriotism' by Leaving Out U.S. Flag

This is complaint is just as stupid when some nerd fanboy makes a YouTube video about how SJW’s have ruined their favorite comic book.

It is a movie… get over it.

[dantes]

As American as Wernher Magnus Maximilian Freiherr von Braun.

[Scratch]

Umm …wasnt it a German scientist that got our space program going?..Just sayin’…

[calirepub]

@WildRose

Read your own citation. “Will Eventually”.

My citation says that “even on earth”, therefore it is likely the conditions on the Moon have rendered the flags there “blank, bleached white by the UV radiation.”

[dantes]

Every flag is symbolic.

[NebraskaFootball]

@Bodecea

Because trump…zees are unhappy unless they can make themselves victims from everything.

It must be exhausting for them.

[Jezcoe]

@WuWei

Why did Armstrong go to the moon?

Because he said “Lunch” not “Launch”

[calirepub]

Every sperm is sacred.

[WildRose]

@calirepub

@BlueTex

@calirepub

If he watched a recording of it, he saw it just as much as you did. You aren’t special.

I watched it live on a zenith console color television… i can still remember what it sounded like changing channels… clunk, clunk, clunk…

Technically it wasn’t live. There was a time delay. Even the speed of light takes time to travel when you’re dealing with distances that large. If my memory serves me right, it was something like 7 minutes.

Yes it most certainly was “live” the only delay was the speed of light which applies to everything you see live.

[WuWei]

@dantes

Every flag is symbolic.

Fine, the planting of the flag.

[WildRose]

@calirepub

@WildRose

Read your own citation. “Will Eventually”.

My citation says that “even on earth”, therefore it is likely the conditions on the Moon have rendered the flags there “blank, bleached white by the UV radiation.”

The entire article is pure speculation. The flag hasn’t been seen or photographed in decades.

[dantes]

Symbolic of what?

[calirepub]

@WildRose

@calirepub

@BlueTex

@calirepub

If he watched a recording of it, he saw it just as much as you did. You aren’t special.

I watched it live on a zenith console color television… i can still remember what it sounded like changing channels… clunk, clunk, clunk…

Technically it wasn’t live. There was a time delay. Even the speed of light takes time to travel when you’re dealing with distances that large. If my memory serves me right, it was something like 7 minutes.

Yes it most certainly was “live” the only delay was the speed of light which applies to everything you see live.

And if we use telescopes we can view stars being born “live”, even though they were born billions of years ago?

I mean, you wouldn’t be wrong if you said yes, but it kind of stretches the concept, in my opinion.

[madasheck]

Life must be dull for Ingraham if she has to dredge up this non-controversy.

[calirepub]

@WildRose

@calirepub

@WildRose

Read your own citation. “Will Eventually”.

My citation says that “even on earth”, therefore it is likely the conditions on the Moon have rendered the flags there “blank, bleached white by the UV radiation.”

The entire article is pure speculation. The flag hasn’t been seen or photographed in decades.

I support a NASA mission to verify the hypothesis. We have to know whether or not America is flying a white flag.

[party-free]

@WuWei

No. The flag was symbolic.

Is the movie about the space race, or about Armstrong?

[WuWei]

@dantes

Symbolic of what?

Winning the race of course.

[Jezcoe]

@WildRose

@calirepub

@WildRose

Read your own citation. “Will Eventually”.

My citation says that “even on earth”, therefore it is likely the conditions on the Moon have rendered the flags there “blank, bleached white by the UV radiation.”

The entire article is pure speculation. The flag hasn’t been seen or photographed in decades.

The thing is that the properties of the flag on the moon is known.

The physics of the environment are known.

The speculation of the condition of the flag can be said with good certainty knowing the material given, the environment and the amount of time exposed to that environment.

To argue differently is pretty silly.

[WildRose]

@calirepub

@WildRose

@calirepub

@BlueTex

@calirepub

If he watched a recording of it, he saw it just as much as you did. You aren’t special.

I watched it live on a zenith console color television… i can still remember what it sounded like changing channels… clunk, clunk, clunk…

Technically it wasn’t live. There was a time delay. Even the speed of light takes time to travel when you’re dealing with distances that large. If my memory serves me right, it was something like 7 minutes.

Yes it most certainly was “live” the only delay was the speed of light which applies to everything you see live.

And if we use telescopes we can view stars being born “live”, even though they were born billions of years ago?

I mean, you wouldn’t be wrong if you said yes, but it kind of stretches the concept, in my opinion.

If it isn’t a recording you are seeing it in real time, “live”. Every time we open our eyes we are getting a live look into the past because of the speed of light and time it takes to process an image from our eyes to our brain.

The only difference is the distance the light has to travel to get here.

[WildRose]

@Jezcoe

@WildRose

@calirepub

@WildRose

Read your own citation. “Will Eventually”.

My citation says that “even on earth”, therefore it is likely the conditions on the Moon have rendered the flags there “blank, bleached white by the UV radiation.”

The entire article is pure speculation. The flag hasn’t been seen or photographed in decades.

The thing is that the properties of the flag on the moon is known.

The physics of the environment are known.

The speculation of the condition of the flag can be said with good certainty knowing the material given, the environment and the amount of time exposed to that environment.

To argue differently is pretty silly.

Without observing the actual results all you can do is speculate. There hasn’t been a flag of it’s type stored in similar conditions to be observed over anywhere near the same time span.