When Trump said, “Go there”
nah that Guilianni acting on behalf of Trump the person/presidential candidate for 2020. where was he designed as a representative of the US or the office of the presidency?
nah that Guilianni acting on behalf of Trump the person/presidential candidate for 2020. where was he designed as a representative of the US or the office of the presidency?
When Trump told him to go. You think this is the first time this has happened?
Why would he need a “designation”?
mobiusptc:nah that Guilianni acting on behalf of Trump the person/presidential candidate for 2020. where was he designed as a representative of the US or the office of the presidency?
When Trump told him to go. You think this is the first time this has happened?
Why would he need a “designation”?
to differentiate between assignment by the office of the presidency vs assignment by Trump of course. its a simple matter and its not like President Trump has not named a slew of special envoys before. so why not in this instance? but its fine, we know the answer…hell even nikki thought the same…
have a nifty day!
Russia is also a major supporter of “not my president” and Calexit among other things.
https://www.cnn.com/2017/04/19/politics/calexit-leader-russia/index.html
Basically the Russians are interested in creating strife and chaos in America. In that respect, the highly partisan impeachment inquiry fits nicely into their overall objectives.
Of course by Democrat logic, anyone who supports “Not my president” or Calexit would be colluding with the Russians. Where are their investigations into those groups?
We are getting a report on one of those investigations on December 9.
When Trump told him to go. You think this is the first time this has happened?
Why would he need a “designation”?
We get it, the President can send anyone he wants to do anything he wants because he’s the ■■■■■■■■■■■■■ president. His interests are the nations interests and there is never a deviation. The president can’t abuse his office.
WuWei: mobiusptc:nah that Guilianni acting on behalf of Trump the person/presidential candidate for 2020. where was he designed as a representative of the US or the office of the presidency?
When Trump told him to go. You think this is the first time this has happened?
Why would he need a “designation”?
to differentiate between assignment by the office of the presidency vs assignment by Trump of course. its a simple matter and its not like President Trump has not named a slew of special envoys before. so why not in this instance? but its fine, we know the answer…hell even nikki thought the same…
have a nifty day!
Because he didn’t want to. Are you under the impression he has to President the way you want him to? He owes you nothing.
It was Obama’s foreign policy that US citizens fighting with terrorists were enemy combatants. Totes ok and perfectly constitutional to drone those traitors. The POTUS is the chief executive and commander in Chief, after all.
It was Obama’s foreign policy that US citizens fighting with terrorists were enemy combatants. Totes ok and perfectly constitutional to drone those traitors. The POTUS is the chief executive and commander in Chief, after all.
Is that what the totes Constitution says?
adroit:It was Obama’s foreign policy that US citizens fighting with terrorists were enemy combatants. Totes ok and perfectly constitutional to drone those traitors. The POTUS is the chief executive and commander in Chief, after all.
Is that what the totes Constitution says?
Yep, the it definitely says he’s commander in Chief.
Submit. Centgov POTUS can do no wrong when it comes to foreign policy. It’s an oxymoron for him to abuse his office.
So let me get this right. She claims she felt like these folks where out to get her. They deny it…and then they provide the evidence they where out to get her…
Because impeachment is a political process. What happened the last time? Process crimes out the ass.
Well how about just giving really clear statements of everyone’s involvement. Doesn’t even have to be under oath. Doesn’t it seem strange that none of them will talk about it openly?
Who is the Chief Exec? Who is the nations top Diplomat? Who is tasked constitutionally with carrying out FP?
That would all be the same person, the POTUS.
Presidents have been appointing special envoys longer than you have been on the planet.
I don’t remember your whining when Obama appointed a slew of them… .
Would you dsay Barack Obama’s foreign policy was a rousing success?
WuWei: adroit:It was Obama’s foreign policy that US citizens fighting with terrorists were enemy combatants. Totes ok and perfectly constitutional to drone those traitors. The POTUS is the chief executive and commander in Chief, after all.
Is that what the totes Constitution says?
Yep, the it definitely says he’s commander in Chief.
So the Chief of the Military can order the extra-judicial assassination of US citizens per the Constitution.
WuWei:Because impeachment is a political process. What happened the last time? Process crimes out the ass.
Well how about just giving really clear statements of everyone’s involvement. Doesn’t even have to be under oath. Doesn’t it seem strange that none of them will talk about it openly?
Ibid.
WuWei:When Trump told him to go. You think this is the first time this has happened?
Why would he need a “designation”?
We get it, the President can send anyone he wants to do anything he wants because he’s the ■■■■■■■■■■■■■ president. His interests are the nations interests and there is never a deviation. The president can’t abuse his office.
Pretty much if they’re willing to go. Of course they need a valid passport and shots and all that. No fruit or other agricultural products coming home.
Submit. Centgov POTUS can do no wrong when it comes to foreign policy. It’s an oxymoron for him to abuse his office.
Of course he can do wrong. He’s going to be impeached, who are you trying to convince?
So the Chief of the Military can order the extra-judicial assassination of US citizens per the Constitution.
Yes, the CiC can order the killing of an enemy combatant in a war zone.
WuWei:So the Chief of the Military can order the extra-judicial assassination of US citizens per the Constitution.
Yes, the CiC can order the killing of an enemy combatant in a war zone.
He can order the execution of US citizens without a trial. Got it.