Forcing Compliance Trans Religion

[Eagle-Keeper]

@Adam

@Guvnah

@Guilds

@Eagle-Keeper

Until the Left stops trying to normalize this behavior and try and force everyone to accept it as such.

Do you feel the same about gays?

Homosexuality is not the norm. Ergo, not normal.

Red heads are not the normal. I don’t want them around my children.

What a brilliant non sequitur equating hair color with sexuality and sexual behavior!

[Adam]

@Eagle-Keeper

@Adam

@Guvnah

@Guilds

@Eagle-Keeper

Until the Left stops trying to normalize this behavior and try and force everyone to accept it as such.

Do you feel the same about gays?

Homosexuality is not the norm. Ergo, not normal.

Red heads are not the normal. I don’t want them around my children.

What a brilliant non sequitur equating hair color with sexuality and sexual behavior!

It was pointing out what I think is false logic. That anything not the norm should not be around children.

[Guilds]

@Eagle-Keeper

What a brilliant non sequitur equating hair color with sexuality and sexual behavior!

Color of hair, skin, and one’s sexuality is determined by nature.

Sexual behavior is a choice.

[Guilds]

@Guvnah

Homosexuality is not the norm. Ergo, not normal.

This seems appropriate to this thread…

[STODR]

@Guilds

Sexual behavior is a choice.

All these years the truth comes out. For years libs have been telling us homosexuals were born that way.

[Guilds]

@STODR

All these years the truth comes out. For years libs have been telling us homosexuals were born that way.

They are. Just as heteros are born that way.

You are confusing sexuality, with sexual behavior.

One can be gay, bi or straight, and choose to not have sex.

[conan]

@Guilds

Sexual behavior is a choice.

Interesting…so they been lying to us all this time.

[Call_me_Ishmael]

@Adam

@Guvnah

@Guilds

@Eagle-Keeper

Until the Left stops trying to normalize this behavior and try and force everyone to accept it as such.

Do you feel the same about gays?

Homosexuality is not the norm. Ergo, not normal.

Red heads are not the normal. I don’t want them around my children.

I doubt that you will be taken to court or lose your job for making that statement and acting on it. Prove otherwise. Not so with expressing the same aversion towards the homosexers.

[Call_me_Ishmael]

@Guilds

@Eagle-Keeper

What a brilliant non sequitur equating hair color with sexuality and sexual behavior!

Color of hair, skin, and one’s sexuality is determined by nature.

Sexual behavior is a choice.

Yes… it’s the the difference between homosexuals and homosexers.

Which group claims the decision of Lawrence vs Texas was a landmark case, in which the Supreme Court of the United States, in 6-3 decision, invalidated sodomy law across the United States, making same-sex sexual activity legal in every State and United States territory?

https://www.aclu.org/other/aclu-history-lawrence-v-texas-watershed-gay-rights

Milestones in the American Gay Rights Movement | American Experience | PBS

June 26, 2003
In Lawrence v. Texas the U.S. Supreme Court rules that sodomy laws in the U.S. are unconstitutional

It looks like most of the gay world says “mox nix” to any supposed difference.

[Adam]

@Call_me_Ishmael

@Adam

@Guvnah

@Guilds

@Eagle-Keeper

Until the Left stops trying to normalize this behavior and try and force everyone to accept it as such.

Do you feel the same about gays?

Homosexuality is not the norm. Ergo, not normal.

Red heads are not the normal. I don’t want them around my children.

I doubt that you will be taken to court or lose your job for making that statement and acting on it. Prove otherwise. Not so with expressing the same aversion towards the homosexers.

You don’t quite get it. Your fear/hatred of homosexuals is as ridiculous as my fake fear of red heads. And I can guarantee you you will go to court for the red head stuff too.

[Call_me_Ishmael]

@Adam

@Call_me_Ishmael

@Adam

@Guvnah

@Guilds

@Eagle-Keeper

Until the Left stops trying to normalize this behavior and try and force everyone to accept it as such.

Do you feel the same about gays?

Homosexuality is not the norm. Ergo, not normal.

Red heads are not the normal. I don’t want them around my children.

I doubt that you will be taken to court or lose your job for making that statement and acting on it. Prove otherwise. Not so with expressing the same aversion towards the homosexers.

You don’t quite get it. Your fear/hatred of homosexuals is as ridiculous as my fake fear of red heads. And I can guarantee you you will go to court for the red head stuff too.

Prove it. There must have been at least one case that you can use.

[Guvnah]

@Guilds

Color of hair, skin, and one’s sexuality is determined by nature.

Sexual behavior is a choice.

Even pedophilia. And rape. It’s a choice. And by your claim, it’s determined by nature.

[Guvnah]

@Adam

fear/hatred

[Call_me_Ishmael]

@Guvnah

@Adam

fear/hatred

It’s all they got when faced with irrefutable arguments that are counter to their own.

[Adam]

Well this is a start. You strike me as someone who would appreciate the law being applied to white people:

Mobile Catastrophic Insurance Claims Company Sued by EEOC for Race...

[Call_me_Ishmael]

@Adam

Well this is a start. You strike me as someone who would appreciate the law being applied to white people:

Mobile Catastrophic Insurance Claims Company Sued by EEOC for Race Discrimination over Hair Policy | U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

Ummmmm … a punt? We already know that racial discrimination is a valid issue. But you said “red hair”, trying to minimize the significance of the homosex issue and the force of law that is being applied to force compliance in thought and deed. Backpedaling so quickly?

[FreeAndClear]

@Call_me_Ishmael

@Guvnah

@Adam

fear/hatred

It’s all they got when faced with irrefutable arguments that are counter to their own.

Irrefutable

Red hair would not be legislated. That’s silly

Homosexuality is outside the norm. It is not normal. Its normalcy is not relevant to anything other than judgment

[Adam]

This is better:

https://www.shrm.org/resourcesandtools/legal-and-compliance/employment-law/pages/house-approves-bill-to-ban-hairstyle-discrimination.aspx

[Call_me_Ishmael]

@Adam

This is better:

https://www.shrm.org/resourcesandtools/legal-and-compliance/employment-law/pages/house-approves-bill-to-ban-hairstyle-discrimination.aspx

Red hair. Come on… you said it.

[Guvnah]

@Call_me_Ishmael

@Adam

And I can guarantee you you will go to court for the red head stuff too.

Prove it. There must have been at least one case that you can use.

@Adam

Catastrophe Management Solutions, a Mobile catastrophic insurance claims company, violated federal law by discriminating against a black applicant for employment because she wore dreadlocks

See? Red dreadlocks.

And actually, the claim in the suit was about RACE, not hair color. In fact, the applicant had blonde hair. Note that the action by the employer was about dreadlocks, not race. Non-blacks wear dreadlocks too, and such an applicant would have face the same rejection.

The lib stretching is gumby-esque.