A student at Rutgers University was banned from taking online virtual classes because he’s unvaccinated, despite the fact that he was willing to stay off campus completely.
Does Rutgers University have some unpublished research that shows that COVID can be transmitted through the internet?
Or is this an example of the state punishing people for making medical decisions that it does not like?
The student has the right to make his own medical decisions. Whether he is vaccinated or not is irrelevant since he is not going to be around other students.
The state-supported school is violating his civil rights.
The University has the right to require vaccinations as a requirement for enrollment. They decided that applies to online students as well. The student in question wasn’t vaccinated and did not qualify for a waiver. He is now transferring.
Yes, many state-supported universities are prime examples of proclaiming “tolerance” until they disagree with your opinions or your lifestyle. Then they want to beat you into submission.
The vaccine requirement is tremendous stretch even for in-person classes. There is no evidence that the unvaccinated students pose a significantly greater threat of transmitting the virus than vaccinated students.
perhaps they are concerned about this student going clubs or teams or participating in in person campus events.
Since they have a vaccine requirement, it follows they would not have to check vaccination status at those events, and therefore, this student would be able to participate in them without being vaccinated.