Yes there was- in the post where you stated âProbably a Maddow disciple like Hodgkinsonâ.
You bring him up in everyâŚsingleâŚthread where thereâs a chance to bring him up.
And then claim people wonât discuss him when he was discussed ad nauseum when the incident happened.
The only way youâll be able to claim âliberal equivalenceâ is if in a couple of yearsâ time some violent liberal goes off and liberals deflect to JJ Kless.
I have found that the weakest among us, attempt to feel better about themselves by artificially putting down those around them vs the hard way of attempting to rise above the fray. In their weakness, theyâll use anything and everything they mentally label a tool, as their weapon. In this case, he used the President. The President is very controversial and says things I didnât think Iâd ever hear come from one of them butâŚthereâs never any excuse to blame the tool and not the fool. In Trumpâs defense, I also never thought Iâd witness our huge media presence being used as a tool by these media giant owners to perpetuate their agenda as they are doing. Trump is battling them from almost every angle, giving fools plenty of ammo on both sides of the aisle.
That being said, the actions of one sick moron do not justify the actions of another sick moron.
A defense of âbut ⌠but ⌠but âŚCharles Manson was a murdererâ will not get you an automatic judgment of ânot guiltyâ in a court of law if you are on trial for muder.