Slippery slope is a logical fallacy.

Unless of course you can provide an example of public health measures turning a country socialist…

Actually it’s not.

And with government it’s practically a guarantee.

No, YOU are denying out of reflex.

You just can’t define socialism and then shoe horn public health into it.

You aren’t thinking clearly, calm down.

Who controls the “production” of “public” health?

Just keep obeying. You will be in the dictionary and famous!

1 Like

Actually it is. I’d say Google it but:

Which is quite convenient for you.

And as per my post to DMK, if it’s practically a guarantee, you should have no problem providing an example of public health measures turning a country to Socialism.

Right, right because:

Who controls the production of public health?

A fallacy is only a fallacy if it’s not true.

Tell you what: you tell me and we’ll go from there

The state. Come on man. It’s practically in the name.

Right! Like saying, for example, public health policy leads to Socialism

Thus far, you and DMK have failed to provide an example of public health policy turning a country to Socialism.

Therefore it is a slippery slope fallacy

Great. Now that you have answered your own question, please state your point.

No, it is socialism.

I didn’t define socialism. Marx et al did. It isn’t “shoe horning” anything.

1 Like

Interesting. Now show your work. How is public health socialism?

The mutation that laughs at your vaccine will be.

1 Like

Again.

So to your mind, any sort of collective action by the polity is Socialism?

-Roads and parks? Socialism?
-The military? Socialism?
-NASA? Socialism?